How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health?
Publication
, Journal Article
Published in: AMA Journal of Ethics
December 1, 2017
Duke Scholars
Published In
AMA Journal of Ethics
DOI
EISSN
2376-6980
Publication Date
December 1, 2017
Volume
19
Issue
12
Start / End Page
1174 / 1182
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health? (2017). AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(12), 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.ecas3-1712
“How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health?” AMA Journal of Ethics 19, no. 12 (December 1, 2017): 1174–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.ecas3-1712.
How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health? AMA Journal of Ethics. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):1174–82.
“How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health?” AMA Journal of Ethics, vol. 19, no. 12, American Medical Association (AMA), Dec. 2017, pp. 1174–82. Crossref, doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.ecas3-1712.
How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health? AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association (AMA); 2017 Dec 1;19(12):1174–1182.
Published In
AMA Journal of Ethics
DOI
EISSN
2376-6980
Publication Date
December 1, 2017
Volume
19
Issue
12
Start / End Page
1174 / 1182
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)