Skip to main content

Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility.

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Park, C; Farrer, TJ; Stuart, JZ; Johnson, KG; Lutz, MW; O'Brien, RJ; Quiroga Del Rio, CE; Chin, P-AE; Koltai, DC
Published in: Neurol Clin Pract
June 2026

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rapid and valid cognitive screening tools are a mainstay of clinical practice in the assessment of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Although there are several available tools, there is concern for reduced sensitivity over time. This study evaluates the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination (DICE) to establish concurrent validity with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and to establish the clinical utility of the DICE in differentiating clinical groups. METHODS: Participants were enrolled prospectively and included a convenience sample of 126 healthy older adults, 59 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 66 with dementia, all age 55+. All participants were administered the MoCA and the DICE in counterbalanced order. Spearman rank-order correlation examined the relationship between DICE and MoCA scores. Likelihood ratio (L-R) chi-square tests assessed the predictive value of cognitive scores, age, sex, and education in diagnostic classification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses evaluated classification accuracy for both tests. RESULTS: The correlation between the DICE and MoCA was strong, suggesting concurrent validity (ρ = 0.89, p < 0.001). Both measures significantly predicted diagnostic groups and demonstrated strong classification accuracy (MoCA AUC = 0.97 (controls), 0.85 (MCI), 0.95 (dementia); DICE AUC = 0.97, 0.94, 0.83, respectively). DISCUSSION: The DICE performed comparably to the MoCA in the current sample of older healthy adults and clinical groups with MCI and dementia. Findings suggest that the DICE is a reasonable and valid screening measure, and future studies should examine other psychometric aspects of the test, such as test-retest reliability, latent factor structure, and longitudinal clinical prediction.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Neurol Clin Pract

DOI

EISSN

2163-0933

Publication Date

June 2026

Volume

16

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e200617

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • ROC Curve
  • Prospective Studies
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Status and Dementia Tests
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Dementia
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Park, C., Farrer, T. J., Stuart, J. Z., Johnson, K. G., Lutz, M. W., O’Brien, R. J., … Koltai, D. C. (2026). Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility. Neurol Clin Pract, 16(3), e200617. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200617
Park, Christine, Thomas J. Farrer, Jill Z. Stuart, Kim G. Johnson, Michael W. Lutz, Richard J. O’Brien, Carolina E. Quiroga Del Rio, Paula-Ann E. Chin, and Deborah C. Koltai. “Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility.Neurol Clin Pract 16, no. 3 (June 2026): e200617. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200617.
Park C, Farrer TJ, Stuart JZ, Johnson KG, Lutz MW, O’Brien RJ, et al. Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility. Neurol Clin Pract. 2026 Jun;16(3):e200617.
Park, Christine, et al. “Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility.Neurol Clin Pract, vol. 16, no. 3, June 2026, p. e200617. Pubmed, doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200617.
Park C, Farrer TJ, Stuart JZ, Johnson KG, Lutz MW, O’Brien RJ, Quiroga Del Rio CE, Chin P-AE, Koltai DC. Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Clinical Utility. Neurol Clin Pract. 2026 Jun;16(3):e200617.

Published In

Neurol Clin Pract

DOI

EISSN

2163-0933

Publication Date

June 2026

Volume

16

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e200617

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • ROC Curve
  • Prospective Studies
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Status and Dementia Tests
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Dementia