Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer
Journal articles
- Journal Article
Sinnott-Armstrong, W
Published in: Legal Theory
June 26, 2026
Philosophy needs a methodology, including rules about burden of proof, in order to resolve many of its classic issues. Law might seem to provide a helpful model for assigning burdens of proof. However, candidate rules that distribute burden of proof according to form, degree of belief, and consequences all fail to help when inspected closely. This gap makes it difficult to see how to resolve many of the most important philosophical issues.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Legal Theory
DOI
EISSN
1469-8048
ISSN
1352-3252
Publication Date
June 26, 2026
Volume
32
Related Subject Headings
- 5003 Philosophy
- 4804 Law in context
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2026). Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer. Legal Theory, 32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325226100883
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer.” Legal Theory 32 (June 26, 2026). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325226100883.
Sinnott-Armstrong W. Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer. Legal Theory. 2026 Jun 26;32.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer.” Legal Theory, vol. 32, June 2026. Scopus, doi:10.1017/S1352325226100883.
Sinnott-Armstrong W. Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer. Legal Theory. 2026 Jun 26;32.
Published In
Legal Theory
DOI
EISSN
1469-8048
ISSN
1352-3252
Publication Date
June 26, 2026
Volume
32
Related Subject Headings
- 5003 Philosophy
- 4804 Law in context