Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Sinnott-Armstrong, W
Published in: Legal Theory
June 26, 2026

Philosophy needs a methodology, including rules about burden of proof, in order to resolve many of its classic issues. Law might seem to provide a helpful model for assigning burdens of proof. However, candidate rules that distribute burden of proof according to form, degree of belief, and consequences all fail to help when inspected closely. This gap makes it difficult to see how to resolve many of the most important philosophical issues.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Legal Theory

DOI

EISSN

1469-8048

ISSN

1352-3252

Publication Date

June 26, 2026

Volume

32

Related Subject Headings

  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 4804 Law in context
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2026). Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer. Legal Theory, 32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325226100883
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer.” Legal Theory 32 (June 26, 2026). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325226100883.
Sinnott-Armstrong W. Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer. Legal Theory. 2026 Jun 26;32.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer.” Legal Theory, vol. 32, June 2026. Scopus, doi:10.1017/S1352325226100883.
Sinnott-Armstrong W. Burden of Proof in Philosophy: Lessons From Law via Schauer. Legal Theory. 2026 Jun 26;32.
Journal cover image

Published In

Legal Theory

DOI

EISSN

1469-8048

ISSN

1352-3252

Publication Date

June 26, 2026

Volume

32

Related Subject Headings

  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 4804 Law in context