Skip to main content

Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Tan, H-L; Liauw, CYT; Chua, T-L; Lam, AYR; Chan, C; Koh, Y-X; Teo, J-Y; Cheow, P-C; Chung, AYF; Goh, BKP
Published in: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
October 2025

BACKGROUND: A robust prognostication model after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can guide clinical management. We aimed to develop a prognostication model for HCC recurrence and survival following liver resection, comparing between Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and supervised machine learning models. METHODS: We studied all patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2022 at our institution. We aimed to predict recurrence-free survival following resection and identify risk categories for HCC recurrence. The CPH model and two supervised machine learning models (random survival forest [RSF] and extreme gradient boosting [XGB]) were used. Model performance was assessed with C-index, time-dependent area under curve (tdAUC) and Brier score. RESULTS: We studied 1290 patients, with 737 (57.1%) experiencing an event (HCC recurrence or death) over a median follow-up duration of 19.2 months. The CPH model had the overall best performance (C-index: 0.663, tdAUC at 6 months: 0.752; 1 year: 0.740; 2 years: 0.722; 5 years: 0.624). Using this model, patients stratified based on risk score could be discriminated between low, intermediate, and high-risk groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A CPH-derived prognostication model was effective for predicting and risk stratifying recurrence and survival following liver resection for HCC.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci

DOI

EISSN

1868-6982

Publication Date

October 2025

Volume

32

Issue

10

Start / End Page

745 / 755

Location

Japan

Related Subject Headings

  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prognosis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Machine Learning
  • Liver Neoplasms
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Tan, H.-L., Liauw, C. Y. T., Chua, T.-L., Lam, A. Y. R., Chan, C., Koh, Y.-X., … Goh, B. K. P. (2025). Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 32(10), 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12186
Tan, Hwee-Leong, Claudia Y. T. Liauw, Tse-Lert Chua, Amanda Y. R. Lam, Cliburn Chan, Ye-Xin Koh, Jin-Yao Teo, Peng-Chung Cheow, Alexander Y. F. Chung, and Brian K. P. Goh. “Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 32, no. 10 (October 2025): 745–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12186.
Tan H-L, Liauw CYT, Chua T-L, Lam AYR, Chan C, Koh Y-X, et al. Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Oct;32(10):745–55.
Tan, Hwee-Leong, et al. “Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, vol. 32, no. 10, Oct. 2025, pp. 745–55. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/jhbp.12186.
Tan H-L, Liauw CYT, Chua T-L, Lam AYR, Chan C, Koh Y-X, Teo J-Y, Cheow P-C, Chung AYF, Goh BKP. Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Oct;32(10):745–755.

Published In

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci

DOI

EISSN

1868-6982

Publication Date

October 2025

Volume

32

Issue

10

Start / End Page

745 / 755

Location

Japan

Related Subject Headings

  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prognosis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Machine Learning
  • Liver Neoplasms