Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Percutaneous Extraluminal Arterial Bypass versus Surgical Arterial Bypass: A Comparative Study in a Porcine Model.

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Stewart, JK; Canario, DH; Ramakrishnan, A; Guzmán, J; Figueredo, FG; Patetta, MA; Parodi, FE; Kim, CY
Published in: J Vasc Interv Radiol
August 7, 2026

PURPOSE: To compare the 4-week patency and degree of intragraft stenosis of a percutaneously created extraluminal arterial bypass using a stent graft with a surgically created prosthetic bypass in a porcine carotid artery model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven female Yorkshire swine underwent both percutaneous and surgical carotid artery bypass procedures. Percutaneous bypasses were created using subcutaneously tunneled 6-mm Gore Viabahn (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona) stent grafts, while surgical bypasses were performed on the contralateral side. Animals received dual antiplatelet therapy and were monitored weekly with Doppler ultrasound (US) for 4 weeks. Graft patency and stenosis were assessed with angiography and explant inspection. Percent stenosis at cranial, midgraft, and caudal segments were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Percutaneous bypass creation was technically successful in 6 of 7 pigs (86%); 1 failure was due to stent graft maldeployment. All successfully placed percutaneous and surgical grafts remained patent at 4 weeks. Mean angiographic stenosis for percutaneous grafts was 47% (caudal), 20% (mid), and 43% (cranial)-versus 34% (caudal; P = .26), 12% (mid; P = .69), and 35% (cranial; P = .42) for surgical grafts-after 4 weeks. Visual inspection demonstrated comparable degrees of intimal hyperplasia (P = 1.0). Four seromas occurred adjacent to surgical bypasses, whereas none occurred with percutaneous bypasses (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Percutaneously created extraluminal arterial bypass demonstrated similar short-term patency and intragraft stenosis compared with surgical bypass, supporting its potential as an alternative revascularization strategy in complex peripheral artery disease.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Vasc Interv Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1535-7732

Publication Date

August 7, 2026

Volume

37

Issue

11

Start / End Page

109005

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Stewart, J. K., Canario, D. H., Ramakrishnan, A., Guzmán, J., Figueredo, F. G., Patetta, M. A., … Kim, C. Y. (2026). Percutaneous Extraluminal Arterial Bypass versus Surgical Arterial Bypass: A Comparative Study in a Porcine Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 37(11), 109005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2026.109005
Stewart, Jessica K., Diego Hipolito Canario, Abinaya Ramakrishnan, Jimmy Guzmán, Francisco G. Figueredo, Matthew A. Patetta, Federico E. Parodi, and Charles Y. Kim. “Percutaneous Extraluminal Arterial Bypass versus Surgical Arterial Bypass: A Comparative Study in a Porcine Model.” J Vasc Interv Radiol 37, no. 11 (August 7, 2026): 109005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2026.109005.
Stewart JK, Canario DH, Ramakrishnan A, Guzmán J, Figueredo FG, Patetta MA, et al. Percutaneous Extraluminal Arterial Bypass versus Surgical Arterial Bypass: A Comparative Study in a Porcine Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2026 Aug 7;37(11):109005.
Stewart, Jessica K., et al. “Percutaneous Extraluminal Arterial Bypass versus Surgical Arterial Bypass: A Comparative Study in a Porcine Model.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, vol. 37, no. 11, Aug. 2026, p. 109005. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2026.109005.
Stewart JK, Canario DH, Ramakrishnan A, Guzmán J, Figueredo FG, Patetta MA, Parodi FE, Kim CY. Percutaneous Extraluminal Arterial Bypass versus Surgical Arterial Bypass: A Comparative Study in a Porcine Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2026 Aug 7;37(11):109005.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Vasc Interv Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1535-7732

Publication Date

August 7, 2026

Volume

37

Issue

11

Start / End Page

109005

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3202 Clinical sciences