Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Myths and facts: What is the evidence for routine environmental sampling---A commentary.

Journal articles  - Review, Editorial
Weber, DJ; Rutala, WA; Thompson, S; Warren, BG; Sickbert-Bennett, EE
Published in: American journal of infection control
September 2026

Before 1970, US hospitals conducted scheduled culturing of the air and environmental surfaces. Currently, routine environmental culturing is not recommended. Targeted microbiologic sampling is only recommended for research purposes, outbreak investigations, and when there are validated culture methods and action level based on culture results.The paper is a commentary. The literature was reviewed to find published guidelines that provide recommendations for appropriate microbiologic sampling of the hospital environment based on validated culture methods and provide action levels based on culture results.Microbiologic sampling of the hospital environment is recommended in the following circumstances: Biological monitoring of sterilization processes, cultures of water/dialysate used for hemodialysis, dental waterlines, specified locations in pharmacies performing sterile compounding, surveillance for Legionella, and sampling of duodenoscopes.Health care facilities should only perform routine microbiological sampling of the environment when recommended by guidelines.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

American journal of infection control

DOI

EISSN

1527-3296

ISSN

0196-6553

Publication Date

September 2026

Volume

54

Issue

9S

Start / End Page

S56 / S62

Related Subject Headings

  • Specimen Handling
  • Microbiological Techniques
  • Humans
  • Hospitals
  • Epidemiology
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Environmental Microbiology
  • 4206 Public health
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Weber, D. J., Rutala, W. A., Thompson, S., Warren, B. G., & Sickbert-Bennett, E. E. (2026). Myths and facts: What is the evidence for routine environmental sampling---A commentary. American Journal of Infection Control, 54(9S), S56–S62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2026.04.009
Weber, David J., William A. Rutala, Sharon Thompson, Bobby G. Warren, and Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett. “Myths and facts: What is the evidence for routine environmental sampling---A commentary.American Journal of Infection Control 54, no. 9S (September 2026): S56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2026.04.009.
Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Thompson S, Warren BG, Sickbert-Bennett EE. Myths and facts: What is the evidence for routine environmental sampling---A commentary. American journal of infection control. 2026 Sep;54(9S):S56–62.
Weber, David J., et al. “Myths and facts: What is the evidence for routine environmental sampling---A commentary.American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 54, no. 9S, Sept. 2026, pp. S56–62. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2026.04.009.
Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Thompson S, Warren BG, Sickbert-Bennett EE. Myths and facts: What is the evidence for routine environmental sampling---A commentary. American journal of infection control. 2026 Sep;54(9S):S56–S62.
Journal cover image

Published In

American journal of infection control

DOI

EISSN

1527-3296

ISSN

0196-6553

Publication Date

September 2026

Volume

54

Issue

9S

Start / End Page

S56 / S62

Related Subject Headings

  • Specimen Handling
  • Microbiological Techniques
  • Humans
  • Hospitals
  • Epidemiology
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Environmental Microbiology
  • 4206 Public health
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences