Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pietrobon, R; Coeytaux, RR; Carey, TS; Richardson, WJ; DeVellis, RF
Published in: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
March 1, 2002

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To identify, evaluate, and compare standard scales for assessing neck pain or dysfunction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The degree of a patient's neck pain or dysfunction can be evaluated using standardized scales at the time of a clinical encounter or during the performance of clinical research protocols. The choice of a scale with the most appropriate characteristics, however, is always a challenge to clinicians and researchers. METHODS: Articles concerning scales for functional evaluation of neck pain or dysfunction were identified by computer searching of MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 1999) and CINAHL (1985 to 2000), citation tracking using the Citation Index, hand searching of relevant journals, and correspondence with experts. RESULTS: Five standard scales were found. Three scales were remarkably similar in terms of structure and psychometric properties: the Neck Disability Index, the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale, and the Northwick Park Scale. However, only the first instrument has been revalidated in different study populations. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale provides a visual template for collection of information, but its usefulness is limited if the questionnaire must be read to the patient. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale is very sensitive to functional changes in individual patients, but comparisons between patients are virtually impossible. CONCLUSIONS: The five scales identified in this study have similar characteristics. The Neck Disability Index, however, has been revalidated more times for evaluation of patient groups. For individual patient follow-up evaluation, the Patient-Specific Functional Scale has high sensitivity to change, and thus represents a good choice for clinical use. The final choice should be tailored according to the target population and the purpose of the evaluation.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

DOI

EISSN

1528-1159

Publication Date

March 1, 2002

Volume

27

Issue

5

Start / End Page

515 / 522

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Pain Measurement
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Orthopedics
  • Neck Pain
  • Neck
  • Humans
  • Disability Evaluation
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pietrobon, R., Coeytaux, R. R., Carey, T. S., Richardson, W. J., & DeVellis, R. F. (2002). Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27(5), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200203010-00012
Pietrobon, Ricardo, Remy R. Coeytaux, Timothy S. Carey, William J. Richardson, and Robert F. DeVellis. “Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27, no. 5 (March 1, 2002): 515–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200203010-00012.
Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):515–22.
Pietrobon, Ricardo, et al. “Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 27, no. 5, Mar. 2002, pp. 515–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/00007632-200203010-00012.
Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):515–522.

Published In

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

DOI

EISSN

1528-1159

Publication Date

March 1, 2002

Volume

27

Issue

5

Start / End Page

515 / 522

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Pain Measurement
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Orthopedics
  • Neck Pain
  • Neck
  • Humans
  • Disability Evaluation