Skip to main content
release_alert
Welcome to the new Scholars 3.0! Read about new features and let us know what you think.
cancel

Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dale, BM; Braithwaite, AC; Boll, DT; Merkle, EM
Published in: Invest Radiol
February 2010

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine what effects a variety of diffusion encoding techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T have on measured abdominal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained in a healthy population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this prospective Institutional Review Board-approved study following written informed consent. Imaging was performed on a 1.5 T and a 3 T magnetic resonance system (Siemens, Erlangen) with several abdominal axial diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions: an orthogonal diffusion encoding with b-values of 0/400 seconds/mm, and a series of four 3-scan trace weighted acquisitions with b-values of 0/50, 0/400, 0/800, 0/50/400/800 seconds/mm, respectively. The mean ADC values were calculated for 3 regions of interest (ROI) in 5 locations (right hepatic lobe, spleen, pancreatic head, body, and tail). The ADC data were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between measured ADC values at 1.5 T and 3 T for liver (P < 0.001), but not for pancreas (P = 0.427) or spleen (P = 0.167). There was no significant difference (P > 0.999) in the measured ADC values between the orthogonal encodings and the 3-scan trace weighted encoding with the same b-value. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) between all 4 weighting schemes for the 3-scan trace with the measured ADC decreasing with increasing b-value. CONCLUSION: Measured abdominal ADC values depend on the exact selection of b-value used for encoding for liver, pancreas, and spleen. In addition, the measured ADC values depend on the field strength of the scanner for liver.

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Invest Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1536-0210

Publication Date

February 2010

Volume

45

Issue

2

Start / End Page

104 / 108

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Viscera
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Information Storage and Retrieval
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dale, B. M., Braithwaite, A. C., Boll, D. T., & Merkle, E. M. (2010). Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Invest Radiol, 45(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c8ceac
Dale, Brian M., Adam C. Braithwaite, Daniel T. Boll, and Elmar M. Merkle. “Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.Invest Radiol 45, no. 2 (February 2010): 104–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c8ceac.
Dale, Brian M., et al. “Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.Invest Radiol, vol. 45, no. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 104–08. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c8ceac.

Published In

Invest Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1536-0210

Publication Date

February 2010

Volume

45

Issue

2

Start / End Page

104 / 108

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Viscera
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Information Storage and Retrieval
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging