Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Goetz, SM; Luber, B; Lisanby, SH; Peterchev, AV
Published in: Brain Stimul
2014

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) play a pivotal role in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), e.g., for determining the motor threshold and probing cortical excitability. Sampled across the range of stimulation strengths, MEPs outline an input-output (IO) curve, which is often used to characterize the corticospinal tract. More detailed understanding of the signal generation and variability of MEPs would provide insight into the underlying physiology and aid correct statistical treatment of MEP data. METHODS: A novel regression model is tested using measured IO data of twelve subjects. The model splits MEP variability into two independent contributions, acting on both sides of a strong sigmoidal nonlinearity that represents neural recruitment. Traditional sigmoidal regression with a single variability source after the nonlinearity is used for comparison. RESULTS: The distribution of MEP amplitudes varied across different stimulation strengths, violating statistical assumptions in traditional regression models. In contrast to the conventional regression model, the dual variability source model better described the IO characteristics including phenomena such as changing distribution spread and skewness along the IO curve. CONCLUSIONS: MEP variability is best described by two sources that most likely separate variability in the initial excitation process from effects occurring later on. The new model enables more accurate and sensitive estimation of the IO curve characteristics, enhancing its power as a detection tool, and may apply to other brain stimulation modalities. Furthermore, it extracts new information from the IO data concerning the neural variability-information that has previously been treated as noise.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Brain Stimul

DOI

EISSN

1876-4754

Publication Date

2014

Volume

7

Issue

4

Start / End Page

541 / 552

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Regression Analysis
  • Pyramidal Tracts
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evoked Potentials, Motor
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Goetz, S. M., Luber, B., Lisanby, S. H., & Peterchev, A. V. (2014). A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials. Brain Stimul, 7(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.002
Goetz, Stefan M., Bruce Luber, Sarah H. Lisanby, and Angel V. Peterchev. “A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.Brain Stimul 7, no. 4 (2014): 541–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.002.
Goetz SM, Luber B, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(4):541–52.
Goetz, Stefan M., et al. “A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.Brain Stimul, vol. 7, no. 4, 2014, pp. 541–52. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.002.
Goetz SM, Luber B, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(4):541–552.
Journal cover image

Published In

Brain Stimul

DOI

EISSN

1876-4754

Publication Date

2014

Volume

7

Issue

4

Start / End Page

541 / 552

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Regression Analysis
  • Pyramidal Tracts
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evoked Potentials, Motor