Skip to main content

In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hutchings, M; Kostakoglu, L; Zaucha, JM; Malkowski, B; Biggi, A; Danielewicz, I; Loft, A; Specht, L; Lamonica, D; Czuczman, MS; Nanni, C ...
Published in: J Clin Oncol
September 1, 2014

PURPOSE: Negative [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) -positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) after two cycles of chemotherapy indicates a favorable prognosis in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We hypothesized that the negative predictive value would be even higher in patients responding rapidly enough to be PET negative after one cycle. This prospective study aimed to assess the prognostic value of PET after one cycle of chemotherapy in HL and to assess the dynamics of FDG uptake after one cycle (PET1) and after two cycles (PET2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All PET scans were read by two blinded, independent reviewers in different countries, according to the Deauville five-point scale. The main end point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included, and all had PET1; 89 patients had both PET1 and PET2. The prognostic value of PET1 was statistically significant with respect to both PFS and overall survival. Two-year PFS for PET1-negative and PET1-positive patients was 94.1% and 40.8%, respectively. Among those with both PET1 and PET2, 2-year PFS was 98.3% and 38.5% for PET1-negative and PET1-positive patients and 90.2% and 23.1% for PET2-negative and PET2-positive patients, respectively. No PET1-negative patient was PET2 positive. CONCLUSION: PET after one cycle of chemotherapy is highly prognostic in HL. No other prognostic tool identifies a group of patients with HL with a more favorable outcome than those patients with a negative PET1. In the absence of precise pretherapeutic predictive markers, PET1 is the best method for response-adapted strategies designed to select patients for less intensive treatment.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Clin Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

Publication Date

September 1, 2014

Volume

32

Issue

25

Start / End Page

2705 / 2711

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Vinblastine
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Survival Rate
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Multimodal Imaging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hutchings, M., Kostakoglu, L., Zaucha, J. M., Malkowski, B., Biggi, A., Danielewicz, I., … Coleman, M. (2014). In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol, 32(25), 2705–2711. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2838
Hutchings, Martin, Lale Kostakoglu, Jan Maciej Zaucha, Bogdan Malkowski, Alberto Biggi, Iwona Danielewicz, Annika Loft, et al. “In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.J Clin Oncol 32, no. 25 (September 1, 2014): 2705–11. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2838.
Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Zaucha JM, Malkowski B, Biggi A, Danielewicz I, et al. In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2705–11.
Hutchings, Martin, et al. “In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.J Clin Oncol, vol. 32, no. 25, Sept. 2014, pp. 2705–11. Pubmed, doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2838.
Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Zaucha JM, Malkowski B, Biggi A, Danielewicz I, Loft A, Specht L, Lamonica D, Czuczman MS, Nanni C, Zinzani PL, Diehl L, Stern R, Coleman M. In vivo treatment sensitivity testing with positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2705–2711.

Published In

J Clin Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

Publication Date

September 1, 2014

Volume

32

Issue

25

Start / End Page

2705 / 2711

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Vinblastine
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Survival Rate
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Multimodal Imaging