Skip to main content

Incubating the research independence of a medical scientist training program graduate: a case study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dzirasa, K; Krishnan, RR; Williams, RS
Published in: Acad Med
February 2015

PROBLEM: Physician-scientists play a critical role in discovering new biological knowledge and translating findings into medical practices that can improve clinical outcomes. Collectively, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its affiliated Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) invest upwards of $500,000 to fully train each of the 900+ MD/PhD students enrolled in these programs. Nevertheless, graduates face the challenges of navigating fragmented intervals of clinical training and research engagement, reinitiating research upon completing their residencies, managing financial pressures, and competing for funding following what is typically four or more years of research inactivity. Together, these barriers contribute to the high attrition rate of MSTP graduates from research careers. APPROACH: The authors designed and implemented (2009-2014), for a single trainee, an alternative postgraduate training model characterized by early research engagement, strategic mentoring, unyoked clinical and research milestones, and dedicated financial support. OUTCOMES: The pilot training experiment was so successful that the trainee secured an NIH project grant and completed his transition to research independence 3.5 years after starting the experimental training schedule-nearly 9 years earlier (based on age) than is typical for MD/PhDs transitioning from mentored to independent research. This success has demonstrated that unyoking research engagement from conventional calendar-based clinical training milestones is a feasible, effective means of incubating research independence in MSTP graduates. NEXT STEPS: The authors encourage the design and application of similar unconventional approaches that interweave residency training with ongoing research activity for appropriate candidates, especially in subspecialties with increased MSTP graduate enrollment.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Acad Med

DOI

EISSN

1938-808X

Publication Date

February 2015

Volume

90

Issue

2

Start / End Page

176 / 179

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Training Support
  • Psychiatry
  • Professional Autonomy
  • National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
  • Mentors
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Education, Medical, Graduate
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dzirasa, K., Krishnan, R. R., & Williams, R. S. (2015). Incubating the research independence of a medical scientist training program graduate: a case study. Acad Med, 90(2), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000568
Dzirasa, Kafui, Ranga R. Krishnan, and R Sanders Williams. “Incubating the research independence of a medical scientist training program graduate: a case study.Acad Med 90, no. 2 (February 2015): 176–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000568.
Dzirasa K, Krishnan RR, Williams RS. Incubating the research independence of a medical scientist training program graduate: a case study. Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):176–9.
Dzirasa, Kafui, et al. “Incubating the research independence of a medical scientist training program graduate: a case study.Acad Med, vol. 90, no. 2, Feb. 2015, pp. 176–79. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000568.
Dzirasa K, Krishnan RR, Williams RS. Incubating the research independence of a medical scientist training program graduate: a case study. Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):176–179.

Published In

Acad Med

DOI

EISSN

1938-808X

Publication Date

February 2015

Volume

90

Issue

2

Start / End Page

176 / 179

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Training Support
  • Psychiatry
  • Professional Autonomy
  • National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
  • Mentors
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Education, Medical, Graduate