RE: net risk reclassification P Values: valid or misleading?
Publication
, Journal Article
Pencina, MJ; Neely, B; Steyerberg, EW
Published in: J Natl Cancer Inst
January 2015
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
J Natl Cancer Inst
DOI
EISSN
1460-2105
Publication Date
January 2015
Volume
107
Issue
1
Start / End Page
355
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Risk Assessment
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Oncology & Carcinogenesis
- Models, Statistical
- Humans
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
- 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pencina, M. J., Neely, B., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2015). RE: net risk reclassification P Values: valid or misleading? J Natl Cancer Inst, 107(1), 355. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju355
Pencina, Michael J., Benjamin Neely, and Ewout W. Steyerberg. “RE: net risk reclassification P Values: valid or misleading?” J Natl Cancer Inst 107, no. 1 (January 2015): 355. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju355.
Pencina MJ, Neely B, Steyerberg EW. RE: net risk reclassification P Values: valid or misleading? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan;107(1):355.
Pencina, Michael J., et al. “RE: net risk reclassification P Values: valid or misleading?” J Natl Cancer Inst, vol. 107, no. 1, Jan. 2015, p. 355. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/jnci/dju355.
Pencina MJ, Neely B, Steyerberg EW. RE: net risk reclassification P Values: valid or misleading? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan;107(1):355.
Published In
J Natl Cancer Inst
DOI
EISSN
1460-2105
Publication Date
January 2015
Volume
107
Issue
1
Start / End Page
355
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Risk Assessment
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Oncology & Carcinogenesis
- Models, Statistical
- Humans
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
- 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis