Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Intraspecific variability improves environmental matching, but does not increase ecological breadth along a wet-to-dry ecotone

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mitchell, RM; Wright, JP; Ames, GM
Published in: Oikos
July 1, 2017

It is widely assumed that higher levels of intraspecific variability in one or more traits should allow species to persist under a wider range of environmental conditions. However, few studies have examined whether species that exhibit high variability are found in a wider range of environmental conditions, and whether variability increases the ability of a species to adapt to prevailing ecological gradients. We used four plant functional traits, specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) and maximum plant height in 49 species across a strong environmental gradient to answer three questions: 1) is there evidence for ‘high-variability’ species (that is, species which show high variability in multiple traits, simultaneously)? 2) are species with more variable traits present across a wider range of environmental conditions than less variable species? And 3) whether more variable species show better trait–environment matching to the prevailing abiotic (soil moisture) gradient at the site? We found little evidence for a ‘high-variability’ species. Variability was correlated for two leaf traits, SLA and LDMC, while variability in leaf traits and plant height were not correlated. We found little evidence that more variable species were present in more diverse conditions: only variation in SLA was correlated with a wider ecological niche breadth. For plant traits along the soil-moisture gradient, higher variability led to better trait–environment matching in half of measured traits. Overall, we found little support for the existence of ‘high-variability’ species, but that variability in SLA is correlated with a wider ecological breadth. We also found evidence that variation in traits can improve trait–environment matching, a relationship which may facilitate our understanding ecological breadth along prevailing gradients, and community assembly on the basis of traits.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Oikos

DOI

EISSN

1600-0706

ISSN

0030-1299

Publication Date

July 1, 2017

Volume

126

Issue

7

Start / End Page

988 / 995

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0602 Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mitchell, R. M., Wright, J. P., & Ames, G. M. (2017). Intraspecific variability improves environmental matching, but does not increase ecological breadth along a wet-to-dry ecotone. Oikos, 126(7), 988–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.04001
Mitchell, R. M., J. P. Wright, and G. M. Ames. “Intraspecific variability improves environmental matching, but does not increase ecological breadth along a wet-to-dry ecotone.” Oikos 126, no. 7 (July 1, 2017): 988–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.04001.
Mitchell, R. M., et al. “Intraspecific variability improves environmental matching, but does not increase ecological breadth along a wet-to-dry ecotone.” Oikos, vol. 126, no. 7, July 2017, pp. 988–95. Scopus, doi:10.1111/oik.04001.
Journal cover image

Published In

Oikos

DOI

EISSN

1600-0706

ISSN

0030-1299

Publication Date

July 1, 2017

Volume

126

Issue

7

Start / End Page

988 / 995

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0602 Ecology