Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1.

Published

Journal Article (Review)

International regulations and guidelines strongly suggest that the use of animal models in scientific research should be initiated only after the authority responsible for the review of animal studies has concluded a well-thought-out harm-benefit analysis (HBA) and deemed the project to be appropriate. Although the process for conducting HBAs may not be new, the relevant factors and algorithms used in conducting them during the review process are deemed to be poorly defined or lacking by committees in many institutions. This paper presents the current concept of HBAs based on a literature review. References on cost or risk benefit from clinical trials and other industries are also included. Several approaches to HBA have been discovered including algorithms, graphic presentations and generic processes. The aim of this study is to better aid and harmonize understanding of the concepts of 'harm', 'benefit' and 'harm-benefit analysis'.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Brønstad, A; Newcomer, CE; Decelle, T; Everitt, JI; Guillen, J; Laber, K

Published Date

  • June 2016

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 50 / 1 Suppl

Start / End Page

  • 1 - 20

PubMed ID

  • 27188275

Pubmed Central ID

  • 27188275

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1758-1117

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1177/0023677216642398

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • England