Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Published

Journal Article (Review)

The evaluation of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease is among the most common diagnostic evaluations with nearly 20 million imaging and exercise stress tests performed annually in the United States. Over the past decade, there has been an evolution in imaging research with an ever-increasing focus on larger registries and randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of varying diagnostic algorithms. The current review highlights recent randomized trial evidence with a particular focus comparing the effectiveness of cardiac imaging procedures within the stable ischemic heart disease evaluation for coronary artery disease detection, angina, and other quality of life measures, and major clinical outcomes. Also highlighted are secondary analyses from these trials on the economic findings related to comparative cost differences across diagnostic testing strategies.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Shaw, LJ; Phillips, LM; Nagel, E; Newby, DE; Narula, J; Douglas, PS

Published Date

  • March 2017

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 10 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 321 - 334

PubMed ID

  • 28279380

Pubmed Central ID

  • 28279380

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1876-7591

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.016

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States