Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Shaw, LJ; Phillips, LM; Nagel, E; Newby, DE; Narula, J; Douglas, PS
Published in: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
March 2017

The evaluation of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease is among the most common diagnostic evaluations with nearly 20 million imaging and exercise stress tests performed annually in the United States. Over the past decade, there has been an evolution in imaging research with an ever-increasing focus on larger registries and randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of varying diagnostic algorithms. The current review highlights recent randomized trial evidence with a particular focus comparing the effectiveness of cardiac imaging procedures within the stable ischemic heart disease evaluation for coronary artery disease detection, angina, and other quality of life measures, and major clinical outcomes. Also highlighted are secondary analyses from these trials on the economic findings related to comparative cost differences across diagnostic testing strategies.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

DOI

EISSN

1876-7591

Publication Date

March 2017

Volume

10

Issue

3

Start / End Page

321 / 334

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Research Design
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Humans
  • Health Care Costs
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Shaw, L. J., Phillips, L. M., Nagel, E., Newby, D. E., Narula, J., & Douglas, P. S. (2017). Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 10(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.016
Shaw, Leslee J., Lawrence M. Phillips, Eike Nagel, David E. Newby, Jagat Narula, and Pamela S. Douglas. “Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10, no. 3 (March 2017): 321–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.016.
Shaw LJ, Phillips LM, Nagel E, Newby DE, Narula J, Douglas PS. Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar;10(3):321–34.
Shaw, Leslee J., et al. “Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, vol. 10, no. 3, Mar. 2017, pp. 321–34. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.016.
Shaw LJ, Phillips LM, Nagel E, Newby DE, Narula J, Douglas PS. Comparative Effectiveness Trials of Imaging-Guided Strategies in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar;10(3):321–334.
Journal cover image

Published In

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

DOI

EISSN

1876-7591

Publication Date

March 2017

Volume

10

Issue

3

Start / End Page

321 / 334

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Research Design
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Humans
  • Health Care Costs
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology