Composite End Points in Clinical Research: A Time for Reappraisal.

Published

Journal Article (Review)

Advances in cardiovascular medicine fueled by innovative clinical trials have dramatically improved the lives of patients worldwide. Commensurate with this progress has been a decline in morbid and mortal events. Accordingly, an increased propensity to collate patient outcomes in clinical trials has emerged that combines death and nonfatal complications into a single composite event. Despite the acknowledged benefits in trial efficiency from such an approach, this method assumes uniform directionality of each component, does not distinguish the relative clinical significance of each, and counts only the first occurrence of any event in the final tally within a conventional time to first event analysis. In this article, we evaluate the criticisms that have been leveled at this approach and provide an overview of recently published phase III cardiovascular trials using primary composite end points. We then explore what to anticipate from the large cohort of as-yet unpublished clinical trials in this arena. Last, we propose a variety of novel approaches that use composite end points and suggest a path forward to enhancing their use in future clinical trials.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Armstrong, PW; Westerhout, CM

Published Date

  • June 6, 2017

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 135 / 23

Start / End Page

  • 2299 - 2307

PubMed ID

  • 28584030

Pubmed Central ID

  • 28584030

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1524-4539

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026229

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States