Scholars@Duke publication: CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Publication , Conference

Paraiso, MFR; Jelovsek, JE; Frick, A; Chen, CCG; Barber, MD

Published in: INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL

August 1, 2010

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL

0937-3462

August 1, 2010

S160 / S161

SPRINGER LONDON LTD

APA

Chicago

ICMJE

MLA

NLM

Paraiso, M. F. R., Jelovsek, J. E., Frick, A., Chen, C. C. G., & Barber, M. D. (2010). CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. In INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (Vol. 21, pp. S160–S161). SPRINGER LONDON LTD.

Paraiso, M. F. R., J. E. Jelovsek, A. Frick, C. C. G. Chen, and M. D. Barber. “CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.” In INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 21:S160–61. SPRINGER LONDON LTD, 2010.

Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. In: INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL. SPRINGER LONDON LTD; 2010. p. S160–1.

Paraiso, M. F. R., et al. “CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.” INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 21, SPRINGER LONDON LTD, 2010, pp. S160–61.

Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL. SPRINGER LONDON LTD; 2010. p. S160–S161.

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL

0937-3462

August 1, 2010

S160 / S161

SPRINGER LONDON LTD