Issues related to using a short-form of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale.

Published

Journal Article

The study examined the reliability and validity, including the factor structure, of a 10-item abbreviated version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-Depression) scale when administered as part of a mail questionnaire. It also examined patterns of nonresponse to items and the effects of imputation of data for missing items on the factor structure of the inventory. A problem of missing data has been reported even with interview administration of the CES-Depression. Researchers have varied considerably in the amount of imputation used to replace missing datapoints. In this study, factor structures varied when items were imputed. In addition, those subjects with complete data were compared with those with up to two imputed datapoints. Those subjects with imputed data were more likely to be female, have lower functional status scores, lower self-reported health status, more advanced age, and a greater number of depressive symptoms than those with no missing data. While the estimate of coefficient alpha of .78 indicated the inventory was reliable, the effects of missing data on construct validity were problematic.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Kimberlin, CL; Pendergast, JF; Berardo, DH; McKenzie, LC

Published Date

  • October 1998

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 83 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 411 - 421

PubMed ID

  • 9819918

Pubmed Central ID

  • 9819918

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0033-2941

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.411

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States