Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Piccini, JP; Passman, R; Turakhia, M; Connolly, AT; Nabutovsky, Y; Varma, N
Published in: Europace
March 1, 2019

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased mortality, but the temporal relationship between AF burden (AFB) and death among patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices is unknown. We sought to characterize the timing and progression of AFB before death. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Merlin.netTM remote monitoring (RM) data, we analysed weekly AFB in patients age ≥55 years implanted with dual-chamber pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices whose death was verified in the Social Security Death Index and who had continuous RM from 1 year to 4 weeks preceding death. Atrial fibrillation burden was defined as amount of time per week atrial rate exceeded a set threshold of 180 b.p.m. Case-crossover analysis was used to compare the AFB at every week to 6 control weeks at the start of the year before death. There were 3131 patients meeting analysis criteria (age at death 76 ± 8 years, 70% men). Weekly increase in AFB >6 h was associated with increased odds of death, which was greatest at 4 weeks before death [odds ratio (OR) 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.09-2.53; P < 0.001]. Atrial fibrillation progression week-to-week >24 h was associated with the greatest odds of death (OR 12.95, 95% 8.72-19.22; P < 0.001). A combination of AFB >6 h per week and activity <0.5 h per day was associated with an increased odds of death. CONCLUSION: In this large patient cohort, AFB progression accelerated in the weeks leading to death. Continuous monitoring of AFB may help identify device patients who may be at risk for adverse outcomes, including death.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Europace

DOI

EISSN

1532-2092

Publication Date

March 1, 2019

Volume

21

Issue

3

Start / End Page

404 / 413

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Remote Sensing Technology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Piccini, J. P., Passman, R., Turakhia, M., Connolly, A. T., Nabutovsky, Y., & Varma, N. (2019). Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace, 21(3), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy222
Piccini, Jonathan P., Rod Passman, Mintu Turakhia, Allison T. Connolly, Yelena Nabutovsky, and Niraj Varma. “Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Europace 21, no. 3 (March 1, 2019): 404–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy222.
Piccini JP, Passman R, Turakhia M, Connolly AT, Nabutovsky Y, Varma N. Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):404–13.
Piccini, Jonathan P., et al. “Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Europace, vol. 21, no. 3, Mar. 2019, pp. 404–13. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/europace/euy222.
Piccini JP, Passman R, Turakhia M, Connolly AT, Nabutovsky Y, Varma N. Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):404–413.
Journal cover image

Published In

Europace

DOI

EISSN

1532-2092

Publication Date

March 1, 2019

Volume

21

Issue

3

Start / End Page

404 / 413

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Remote Sensing Technology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female