The risks of odds ratios: Relative risks are more naturally understood.
Publication
, Journal Article
Gallis, JA; Turner, EL
Published in: BJOG
December 2019
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
BJOG
DOI
EISSN
1471-0528
Publication Date
December 2019
Volume
126
Issue
13
Start / End Page
1556 / 1557
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Statistics as Topic
- Pregnancy
- Odds Ratio
- Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics
- Humans
- Female
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- 3215 Reproductive medicine
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gallis, J. A., & Turner, E. L. (2019). The risks of odds ratios: Relative risks are more naturally understood. BJOG, 126(13), 1556–1557. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15507
Gallis, John A., and Elizabeth L. Turner. “The risks of odds ratios: Relative risks are more naturally understood.” BJOG 126, no. 13 (December 2019): 1556–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15507.
Gallis JA, Turner EL. The risks of odds ratios: Relative risks are more naturally understood. BJOG. 2019 Dec;126(13):1556–7.
Gallis, John A., and Elizabeth L. Turner. “The risks of odds ratios: Relative risks are more naturally understood.” BJOG, vol. 126, no. 13, Dec. 2019, pp. 1556–57. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15507.
Gallis JA, Turner EL. The risks of odds ratios: Relative risks are more naturally understood. BJOG. 2019 Dec;126(13):1556–1557.
Published In
BJOG
DOI
EISSN
1471-0528
Publication Date
December 2019
Volume
126
Issue
13
Start / End Page
1556 / 1557
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Statistics as Topic
- Pregnancy
- Odds Ratio
- Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics
- Humans
- Female
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- 3215 Reproductive medicine
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences