Cost-Utility Analysis of rhBMP-2 Use in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Published

Journal Article

STUDY DESIGN: Economic modeling of data from a multicenter, prospective registry. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the cost utility of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD surgery is expensive and presents risk of major complications. BMP is frequently used off-label to reduce the risk of pseudarthrosis. METHODS: Of 522 ASD patients with fusion of five or more spinal levels, 367 (70%) had at least 2-year follow-up. Total direct cost was calculated by adding direct costs of the index surgery and any subsequent reoperations or readmissions. Cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were calculated from the change in preoperative to final follow-up SF-6D health utility score. A decision-analysis model comparing BMP versus no-BMP was developed with pseudarthrosis as the primary outcome. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using mixed first-order and second-order Monte Carlo simulations. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed by varying cost, probability, and QALY estimates (Alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: BMP was used in the index surgery for 267 patients (73%). The mean (±standard deviation) direct cost of BMP for the index surgery was $14,000 ± $6400. Forty patients (11%) underwent revision surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis (BMP group, 8.6%; no-BMP group, 17%; P = 0.022). The mean 2-year direct cost was significantly higher for patients with pseudarthrosis ($138,000 ± $17,000) than for patients without pseudarthrosis ($61,000 ± $25,000) (P < 0.001). Simulation analysis revealed that BMP was associated with positive incremental utility in 67% of patients and considered favorable at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY in >52% of patients. CONCLUSION: BMP use was associated with reduction in revisions for symptomatic pseudarthrosis in ASD surgery. Cost-utility analysis suggests that BMP use may be favored in ASD surgery; however, this determination requires further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Jain, A; Yeramaneni, S; Kebaish, KM; Raad, M; Gum, JL; Klineberg, EO; Hassanzadeh, H; Kelly, MP; Passias, PG; Ames, CP; Smith, JS; Shaffrey, CI; Bess, S; Lafage, V; Glassman, S; Carreon, LY; Hostin, RA; International Spine Study Group,

Published Date

  • July 15, 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 45 / 14

Start / End Page

  • 1009 - 1015

PubMed ID

  • 32097274

Pubmed Central ID

  • 32097274

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1528-1159

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003442

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States