Skip to main content

The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gedde, SJ; Singh, K; Schiffman, JC; Feuer, WJ; Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group,
Published in: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
March 2012

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study is a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of tube-shunt surgery to trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in eyes with previous cataract and/or failed glaucoma surgery. This article interprets results from the TVT Study and applies them to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Both tube-shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with MMC produced intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction to the low teens throughout the 5-year duration of the study. Tube-shunt surgery was associated with use of more glaucoma medications than trabeculectomy with MMC during the first 2 years of the study, but medical therapy equalized with longer follow-up. Trabeculectomy with MMC had higher rates of surgical failure and reoperation for glaucoma compared with tube-shunt surgery. Vision loss occurred at a similar rate with the two surgical procedures. Early complications were more frequent after trabeculectomy with MMC relative to tube-shunt surgery, but both procedures had similar rates of late postoperative complications and serious complications. SUMMARY: Tube-shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with MMC are both viable surgical options for managing glaucoma in patients who have undergone prior cataract and/or failed filtering surgery. Results of the TVT Study support the expanding use of tube shunts beyond refractory glaucomas.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1531-7021

Publication Date

March 2012

Volume

23

Issue

2

Start / End Page

118 / 126

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Trabeculectomy
  • Stents
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prognosis
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Mitomycin
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans
  • Glaucoma Drainage Implants
  • Glaucoma
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gedde, S. J., Singh, K., Schiffman, J. C., Feuer, W. J., & Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group, . (2012). The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 23(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff2d1
Gedde, Steven J., Kuldev Singh, Joyce C. Schiffman, William J. Feuer, and William J. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. “The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice.Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23, no. 2 (March 2012): 118–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff2d1.
Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;23(2):118–26.
Gedde, Steven J., et al. “The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice.Curr Opin Ophthalmol, vol. 23, no. 2, Mar. 2012, pp. 118–26. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff2d1.
Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;23(2):118–126.

Published In

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1531-7021

Publication Date

March 2012

Volume

23

Issue

2

Start / End Page

118 / 126

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Trabeculectomy
  • Stents
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prognosis
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Mitomycin
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans
  • Glaucoma Drainage Implants
  • Glaucoma