Skip to main content

Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brunstein, CG; O'Donnell, PV; Logan, B; Dawson, P; Costa, L; Cutler, C; Craig, M; Hogan, W; Horowitz, MM; Horwitz, ME; Karanes, C; Magenau, JM ...
Published in: Transplant Cell Ther
July 2022

We previously reported the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 1101, a randomized comparison of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) performed with double umbilical cord blood units (dUCB) or with haploidentical bone marrow (haplo-BMT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting. Those results showed similar progression-free survival in the 2 treatment groups but lower nonrelapse mortality and better overall survival in the haplo-BM arm. In this secondary analysis, we sought to investigate whether transplantation center's previous experience with haplo-BM and/or dUCB HCT had an impact on outcomes. All patients randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. Center experience was assigned based on the number of transplantations with each platform performed in the year before initiation of the study according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Centers were then classified as a dUCB center (>10 dUCB HCTs; n = 117 patients, 10 centers), a haplo-BM center (>10 haplo-BM HCTs and ≤10 dUCB HCTs; n = 110 patients, 2 centers), or other center (≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs; n = 140 patients, 21 centers). After adjusting for age, Karnofsky Performance Status, and Disease Risk Index, we found that haplo-BM centers had lower overall mortality with this donor type compared with dUCB centers (hazard ratio [HR], 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44 to 4.56). In contrast, there were no differences in overall mortality between haplo-BM and dUCB in centers that were experienced with dUCB HCT (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, .59 to 1.79) or had limited to no experience with either dUCB or haplo-BM HCT (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, .83 to 2.21). The higher risk of treatment failure and overall mortality in dUCB HCT in haplo BM-experienced centers was driven by a significantly higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.97). With the exception of worse outcomes among dUCB HCT recipients in haplo-BM centers, transplantation center experience in the year before initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had a limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Transplant Cell Ther

DOI

EISSN

2666-6367

Publication Date

July 2022

Volume

28

Issue

7

Start / End Page

406.e1 / 406.e6

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Transplantation, Haploidentical
  • Transplantation Conditioning
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Bone Marrow
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brunstein, C. G., O’Donnell, P. V., Logan, B., Dawson, P., Costa, L., Cutler, C., … Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, . (2022). Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012. Transplant Cell Ther, 28(7), 406.e1-406.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.024
Brunstein, Claudio G., Paul V. O’Donnell, Brent Logan, Peter Dawson, Luciano Costa, Corey Cutler, Michael Craig, et al. “Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012.Transplant Cell Ther 28, no. 7 (July 2022): 406.e1-406.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.024.
Brunstein CG, O’Donnell PV, Logan B, Dawson P, Costa L, Cutler C, et al. Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jul;28(7):406.e1-406.e6.
Brunstein, Claudio G., et al. “Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012.Transplant Cell Ther, vol. 28, no. 7, July 2022, pp. 406.e1-406.e6. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.024.
Brunstein CG, O’Donnell PV, Logan B, Dawson P, Costa L, Cutler C, Craig M, Hogan W, Horowitz MM, Horwitz ME, Karanes C, Magenau JM, Malone A, McCarty J, McGuirk JP, Morris LE, Rezvani AR, Salit R, Vasu S, Eapen M, Fuchs EJ, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Impact of Center Experience with Donor Type on Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1101Open for Accrual June 2012Open for Accrual June 2012. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jul;28(7):406.e1-406.e6.

Published In

Transplant Cell Ther

DOI

EISSN

2666-6367

Publication Date

July 2022

Volume

28

Issue

7

Start / End Page

406.e1 / 406.e6

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Transplantation, Haploidentical
  • Transplantation Conditioning
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Bone Marrow
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences