A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.

Published

Journal Article

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and adverse pathologic features in patients undergoing either radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1006 patients treated with RPP or RRP at our institution from 1988 to 2005. Operative times and EBL were compared among BMI groups for both RPP and RRP. The odds ratio of positive surgical margins was estimated for the BMI categories using logistic regression after adjusting for preoperative and pathologic characteristics. RESULTS: Increased BMI was significantly associated with increased operative time and EBL for men treated with either RPP or RRP (all P < or = 0.03), though the associations were weak (all Spearman r < or = 0.19). After adjusting for multiple clinical preoperative characteristics, higher BMI was associated with positive surgical margins among all patients (P trend <0.001). The association between obesity and surgical margins remained after adjusting for pathologic characteristics (P trend = 0.001) with similar patterns among RRP (P trend = 0.03) and RPP (P trend = 0.01) patients. CONCLUSIONS: For mildly obese men, both RPP and RRP are associated with a similarly increased risk of higher EBL, longer operative time, and positive surgical margins. These data do not provide evidence to suggest that RPP should be preferred over RRP for mildly obese men. Further study is needed among men with a very high BMI.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Fitzsimons, NJ; Sun, LL; Dahm, P; Moul, JW; Madden, J; Gan, TJ; Freedland, SJ

Published Date

  • December 2007

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 70 / 6

Start / End Page

  • 1146 - 1151

PubMed ID

  • 18158036

Pubmed Central ID

  • 18158036

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1527-9995

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.065

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States