Skip to main content

A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Waldron, NH; Miller, TE; Thacker, JK; Manchester, AK; White, WD; Nardiello, J; Elgasim, MA; Moon, RE; Gan, TJ
Published in: Anesth Analg
May 2014

BACKGROUND: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is associated with improved outcomes after surgery. The esophageal Doppler monitor (EDM) is widely used, but has several limitations. The NICOM, a completely noninvasive cardiac output monitor (Cheetah Medical), may be appropriate for guiding GDFT. No prospective studies have compared the NICOM and the EDM. We hypothesized that the NICOM is not significantly different from the EDM for monitoring during GDFT. METHODS: One hundred adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery participated in this study. Patients in phase I (n = 50) had intraoperative GDFT guided by the EDM while the NICOM was connected, and patients in phase II (n = 50) had intraoperative GDFT guided by the NICOM while the EDM was connected. Each patient's stroke volume was optimized using 250-mL colloid boluses. Agreement between the monitors was assessed, and patient outcomes (postoperative pain, nausea, and return of bowel function), complications (renal, pulmonary, infectious, and wound complications), and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared. RESULTS: Using a 10% increase in stroke volume after fluid challenge, agreement between monitors was 60% at 5 minutes, 61% at 10 minutes, and 66% at 15 minutes, with no significant systematic disagreement (McNemar P > 0.05) at any time point. The EDM had significantly more missing data than the NICOM. No clinically significant differences were found in total LOS or other outcomes. The mean LOS was 6.56 ± 4.32 days in phase I and 6.07 ± 2.85 days in phase II, and 95% confidence limits for the difference were -0.96 to +1.95 days (P = 0.5016). CONCLUSIONS: The NICOM performs similarly to the EDM in guiding GDFT, with no clinically significant differences in outcomes, and offers increased ease of use as well as fewer missing data points. The NICOM may be a viable alternative monitor to guide GDFT.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Anesth Analg

DOI

EISSN

1526-7598

Publication Date

May 2014

Volume

118

Issue

5

Start / End Page

966 / 975

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Doppler
  • Stroke Volume
  • Rectum
  • Prospective Studies
  • Postoperative Period
  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Length of Stay
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Waldron, N. H., Miller, T. E., Thacker, J. K., Manchester, A. K., White, W. D., Nardiello, J., … Gan, T. J. (2014). A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg, 118(5), 966–975. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000182
Waldron, Nathan H., Timothy E. Miller, Julie K. Thacker, Amy K. Manchester, William D. White, John Nardiello, Magdi A. Elgasim, Richard E. Moon, and Tong J. Gan. “A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients.Anesth Analg 118, no. 5 (May 2014): 966–75. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000182.
Waldron NH, Miller TE, Thacker JK, Manchester AK, White WD, Nardiello J, et al. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):966–75.
Waldron, Nathan H., et al. “A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients.Anesth Analg, vol. 118, no. 5, May 2014, pp. 966–75. Pubmed, doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000182.
Waldron NH, Miller TE, Thacker JK, Manchester AK, White WD, Nardiello J, Elgasim MA, Moon RE, Gan TJ. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):966–975.

Published In

Anesth Analg

DOI

EISSN

1526-7598

Publication Date

May 2014

Volume

118

Issue

5

Start / End Page

966 / 975

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Doppler
  • Stroke Volume
  • Rectum
  • Prospective Studies
  • Postoperative Period
  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Length of Stay