Murphy, G. S., Szokol, J. W., Avram, M. J., Greenberg, S. B., Marymont, J. H., Vender, J. S., … Gupta, D. K. (2012). A Train-of-Four Count Should Be a Train-of-Four Count, Independently of the Method It Was Determined With Reply. ANESTHESIOLOGY. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS 530 WALNUT ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3621 USA.

Murphy, Glenn S., Joseph W. Szokol, Michael J. Avram, Steven B. Greenberg, Jesse H. Marymont, Jeffery S. Vender, Jayla Gray, Elizabeth Landry, and Dhanesh K. Gupta. “A Train-of-Four Count Should Be a Train-of-Four Count, Independently of the Method It Was Determined With Reply.” ANESTHESIOLOGY. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS 530 WALNUT ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3621 USA, 2012.

Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, et al. A Train-of-Four Count Should Be a Train-of-Four Count, Independently of the Method It Was Determined With Reply. Vol. 116, ANESTHESIOLOGY. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS 530 WALNUT ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3621 USA; 2012. p. 1396–7.

Murphy, Glenn S., et al. “A Train-of-Four Count Should Be a Train-of-Four Count, Independently of the Method It Was Determined With Reply.” ANESTHESIOLOGY, vol. 116, LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS 530 WALNUT ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3621 USA, 2012, pp. 1396–97.

Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E, Gupta DK. A Train-of-Four Count Should Be a Train-of-Four Count, Independently of the Method It Was Determined With Reply. ANESTHESIOLOGY. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS 530 WALNUT ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3621 USA; 2012. p. 1396–1397.