Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

A comparison of the aerosol thickness derived from ground-based and airborne measurements

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kato, S; Bergin, MH; Ackerman, TP; Charlock, TP; Clothiaux, EE; Ferrare, RA; Halthore, RN; Laulainen, N; Mace, GG; Michalsky, J; Turner, DD
Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
June 16, 2000

The extinction optical thickness of particles obtained from scattering and absorption coefficients measured by an airborne integrating nephelometer and particle soot absorption photometer, respectively, is compared with the aerosol optical thickness derived from a ground-based multifilter rotating shadowband radiometer, a Sun photometer, and a Raman lidar for 9 days. These 9 days are selected from intensive operation periods of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement in April 1997, September 1997, and August 1998 at the southern Great Plains. For April 1997 and September 1997 cases the difference between the extinction optical thickness of particles estimated from vertical profiles and the extinction optical thickness of aerosol derived from the multifilter rotating shadowband radiometer is not significant. For August 1998 cases when the boundary layer relative humidity is higher than April 1997 and September 1997 cases, the extinction optical thickness of particles is 0.03 to 0.07 less than the extinction optical thickness of aerosol. The difference corresponds to 25% to 31% of the extinction optical thickness of aerosol. Based on these comparisons, the upper and lower limits of-the single-scattering albedo of particles present in the lower part of troposphere are 0.97 and 0.84, respectively. Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

DOI

ISSN

0148-0227

Publication Date

June 16, 2000

Volume

105

Issue

D11

Start / End Page

14701 / 14717

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kato, S., Bergin, M. H., Ackerman, T. P., Charlock, T. P., Clothiaux, E. E., Ferrare, R. A., … Turner, D. D. (2000). A comparison of the aerosol thickness derived from ground-based and airborne measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 105(D11), 14701–14717. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900013
Kato, S., M. H. Bergin, T. P. Ackerman, T. P. Charlock, E. E. Clothiaux, R. A. Ferrare, R. N. Halthore, et al. “A comparison of the aerosol thickness derived from ground-based and airborne measurements.” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 105, no. D11 (June 16, 2000): 14701–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900013.
Kato S, Bergin MH, Ackerman TP, Charlock TP, Clothiaux EE, Ferrare RA, et al. A comparison of the aerosol thickness derived from ground-based and airborne measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2000 Jun 16;105(D11):14701–17.
Kato, S., et al. “A comparison of the aerosol thickness derived from ground-based and airborne measurements.” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 105, no. D11, June 2000, pp. 14701–17. Scopus, doi:10.1029/2000JD900013.
Kato S, Bergin MH, Ackerman TP, Charlock TP, Clothiaux EE, Ferrare RA, Halthore RN, Laulainen N, Mace GG, Michalsky J, Turner DD. A comparison of the aerosol thickness derived from ground-based and airborne measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 2000 Jun 16;105(D11):14701–14717.

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

DOI

ISSN

0148-0227

Publication Date

June 16, 2000

Volume

105

Issue

D11

Start / End Page

14701 / 14717

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences