Skip to main content

Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Housden, BE; Muhar, M; Gemberling, M; Gersbach, CA; Stainier, DYR; Seydoux, G; Mohr, SE; Zuber, J; Perrimon, N
Published in: Nature reviews. Genetics
January 2017

Our understanding of the genetic mechanisms that underlie biological processes has relied extensively on loss-of-function (LOF) analyses. LOF methods target DNA, RNA or protein to reduce or to ablate gene function. By analysing the phenotypes that are caused by these perturbations the wild-type function of genes can be elucidated. Although all LOF methods reduce gene activity, the choice of approach (for example, mutagenesis, CRISPR-based gene editing, RNA interference, morpholinos or pharmacological inhibition) can have a major effect on phenotypic outcomes. Interpretation of the LOF phenotype must take into account the biological process that is targeted by each method. The practicality and efficiency of LOF methods also vary considerably between model systems. We describe parameters for choosing the optimal combination of method and system, and for interpreting phenotypes within the constraints of each method.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Nature reviews. Genetics

DOI

EISSN

1471-0064

ISSN

1471-0056

Publication Date

January 2017

Volume

18

Issue

1

Start / End Page

24 / 40

Related Subject Headings

  • Species Specificity
  • RNA Interference
  • Phenotype
  • Mutation
  • Mutagenesis
  • Morpholinos
  • Models, Animal
  • Humans
  • Genotype
  • Gene Silencing
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Housden, B. E., Muhar, M., Gemberling, M., Gersbach, C. A., Stainier, D. Y. R., Seydoux, G., … Perrimon, N. (2017). Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 18(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.118
Housden, Benjamin E., Matthias Muhar, Matthew Gemberling, Charles A. Gersbach, Didier Y. R. Stainier, Geraldine Seydoux, Stephanie E. Mohr, Johannes Zuber, and Norbert Perrimon. “Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences.Nature Reviews. Genetics 18, no. 1 (January 2017): 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.118.
Housden BE, Muhar M, Gemberling M, Gersbach CA, Stainier DYR, Seydoux G, et al. Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences. Nature reviews Genetics. 2017 Jan;18(1):24–40.
Housden, Benjamin E., et al. “Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences.Nature Reviews. Genetics, vol. 18, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 24–40. Epmc, doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.118.
Housden BE, Muhar M, Gemberling M, Gersbach CA, Stainier DYR, Seydoux G, Mohr SE, Zuber J, Perrimon N. Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences. Nature reviews Genetics. 2017 Jan;18(1):24–40.

Published In

Nature reviews. Genetics

DOI

EISSN

1471-0064

ISSN

1471-0056

Publication Date

January 2017

Volume

18

Issue

1

Start / End Page

24 / 40

Related Subject Headings

  • Species Specificity
  • RNA Interference
  • Phenotype
  • Mutation
  • Mutagenesis
  • Morpholinos
  • Models, Animal
  • Humans
  • Genotype
  • Gene Silencing