Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hussaini, SMQ; Murphy, KR; Han, JL; Elsamadicy, AA; Yang, S; Premji, A; Parente, B; Xie, J; Pagadala, P; Lad, SP
Published in: Neuromodulation
June 2017

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as an appropriate modality of treatment for intractable chronic pain. The present study examines variations in SCS trial-to-permanent conversion rates based on provider types performing the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a large, retrospective analysis using the Truven MarketScan data base analyzing adult SCS patients with provider information available, with or without IPG implantation from the years 2007-2012. Patients were categorized based on provider type performing the implantation including anesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R). Univariate and multivariate models identified factors associated with successful conversion. RESULTS: A total of 7667 unique instances of SCS implants were identified across five providers. Overall, 4842 (63.2%) of those receiving trials underwent permanent SCS system implantation. Anesthesiology performed the majority of implants (62.8%), followed by neurosurgery (22.0%), orthopedic surgery (10.2%), and PM&R (5.3%). Compared to anesthesiologists, both neurosurgeons (OR 10.99, 95% CI [9.11, 13.25]; p < 0.001) and orthopedic surgeons (OR 4.64, 95% CI [3.81, 5.65]; p < 0.001) had significantly higher conversion rates, while PM&R (OR 0.71, 95% CI [0.58, 0.87]; p = 0.001) had significantly lower. Percutaneous implants comprised 5473 (71.4%) of all implants. Neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons performed a significantly greater number of paddle implants among the different providers (p < 0.0001). Explant rates were similar across all cohorts analyzed (average 11.6%; p = 0.546). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide analysis, our results suggest that over a recent five-year period, conversion rates are highest when SCS trials are performed by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. The study has important implications for establishing uniform guidelines for training, patient selection, and education of physicians across multiple disciplines.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Neuromodulation

DOI

EISSN

1525-1403

Publication Date

June 2017

Volume

20

Issue

4

Start / End Page

340 / 347

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Medicine
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hussaini, S. M. Q., Murphy, K. R., Han, J. L., Elsamadicy, A. A., Yang, S., Premji, A., … Lad, S. P. (2017). Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation, 20(4), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12582
Hussaini, Syed Mohammed Qasim, Kelly Ryan Murphy, Jing L. Han, Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Siyun Yang, Alykhan Premji, Beth Parente, Jichun Xie, Promila Pagadala, and Shivanand P. Lad. “Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain.Neuromodulation 20, no. 4 (June 2017): 340–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12582.
Hussaini SMQ, Murphy KR, Han JL, Elsamadicy AA, Yang S, Premji A, et al. Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):340–7.
Hussaini, Syed Mohammed Qasim, et al. “Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain.Neuromodulation, vol. 20, no. 4, June 2017, pp. 340–47. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/ner.12582.
Hussaini SMQ, Murphy KR, Han JL, Elsamadicy AA, Yang S, Premji A, Parente B, Xie J, Pagadala P, Lad SP. Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):340–347.
Journal cover image

Published In

Neuromodulation

DOI

EISSN

1525-1403

Publication Date

June 2017

Volume

20

Issue

4

Start / End Page

340 / 347

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Medicine
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies