Skip to main content

SU-E-I-47: Comparison of Risks for Two Medical Imaging Procedures.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Choudhury, KR; Tian, R; Li, X; Samei, E
Published in: Med Phys
June 2012

PURPOSE: Radiologists may need to decide which type of image procedure is most appropriate for a particular patient. One factor relevant in making this decision is the relative risk of secondary cancers due to each relevant procedure. Differences in the risk posed by each method are not just due to the total radiation dose imparted by each procedure, but also the distribution of absorbed dose across various organs in the imaging procedure. Two imaging procedures with the same total radiation dose may pose different risks of differential sensitivity to radiation across organs. METHODS: New methods of radiation dosimetry enable us to estimate the dose distribution across organs in individual patients. We propose a measure of the relative risk of two medical imaging procedures derived from the hazard function of cancer incidence. The relative risk measure is shown to approximately equal to a weighted sum of the dose difference in each organ. The weights are proportional to organ specific incidence rates. The measure is also sensitive to factors such as the patient's age at exposure to radiation, the attained age and gender, as well as the incidence characteristics of the population to which the patient belongs. We propose to quantify the effects of these factors using information from publically available SEER database for US based patients as well as the LSS study of atomic bomb survivors. The method is illustrated by application to a study comparing chest and abdominal CT scans for a group of pediatric patients. RESULTS: Fig. 1 shows higher absolute relative risk for those exposed at younger ages, with chest scans being riskier for females while abdominal scans were riskier for males. At higher ages, the relative risk is approximately equal. CONCLUSIONS: Relative risks can quantify risks comparisons between imaging procedures.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

2473-4209

Publication Date

June 2012

Volume

39

Issue

6Part4

Start / End Page

3635

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Choudhury, K. R., Tian, R., Li, X., & Samei, E. (2012). SU-E-I-47: Comparison of Risks for Two Medical Imaging Procedures. Med Phys, 39(6Part4), 3635. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4734763
Choudhury, K Roy, R. Tian, X. Li, and E. Samei. “SU-E-I-47: Comparison of Risks for Two Medical Imaging Procedures.Med Phys 39, no. 6Part4 (June 2012): 3635. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4734763.
Choudhury KR, Tian R, Li X, Samei E. SU-E-I-47: Comparison of Risks for Two Medical Imaging Procedures. Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part4):3635.
Choudhury, K. Roy, et al. “SU-E-I-47: Comparison of Risks for Two Medical Imaging Procedures.Med Phys, vol. 39, no. 6Part4, June 2012, p. 3635. Pubmed, doi:10.1118/1.4734763.
Choudhury KR, Tian R, Li X, Samei E. SU-E-I-47: Comparison of Risks for Two Medical Imaging Procedures. Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part4):3635.

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

2473-4209

Publication Date

June 2012

Volume

39

Issue

6Part4

Start / End Page

3635

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences