Skip to main content

Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Marlowe, AL; Chinnici, JE; Rivas, A; Niparko, JK; Francis, HW
Published in: Otol Neurotol
January 2010

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of revision cochlear implantation (RCI) and to identify clinical and device-related factors predictive of RCI outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series with attempted correlation to ex vivo device analysis. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children (<18 yr) who underwent RCI in a tertiary-care center. INTERVENTION: Revision cochlear implantation with multichannel cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Open-set speech perception testing and subjective report by child, family, teacher, or therapist; patient report of symptom resolution. RESULTS: During the 15-year period, 13% of pediatric CI surgeries were revised (at an average of 3.4 yr after initial operation). Hard failures (42%), suspected device failure (29%), and extracochlear electrodes (16%) were the most common indications for RCI. Most hard and suspected device failure cases (n = 37; 84%) reported a return to previous peak performance within 18 months of RCI. Previous peak performance was more likely to be achieved or exceeded in younger than in older children. A decline in speech perception was a stronger predictor of successful outcome (100%) than chronic underperformance (57%) among children with suspected device failure. Preoperative integrity testing was only moderately predictive of functional results or findings at ex vivo device analysis. CONCLUSION: Revision cochlear implantation should be considered when longitudinal clinical assessment reveals an unfavorable trajectory in the development of receptive communication skills. Device testing provides important, but not definitive, supporting data. Revision cochlear implantation as guided by device and patient factors can exert a positive impact on access to verbal language and therefore its development. A delay to act can have lasting negative consequences because benefits seem to diminish with age.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Otol Neurotol

DOI

EISSN

1537-4505

Publication Date

January 2010

Volume

31

Issue

1

Start / End Page

74 / 82

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Speech Perception
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reoperation
  • Regression Analysis
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medical Records
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Infant
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Marlowe, A. L., Chinnici, J. E., Rivas, A., Niparko, J. K., & Francis, H. W. (2010). Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience. Otol Neurotol, 31(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c29fad
Marlowe, Andrea L., Jill E. Chinnici, Alejandro Rivas, John K. Niparko, and Howard W. Francis. “Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience.Otol Neurotol 31, no. 1 (January 2010): 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c29fad.
Marlowe AL, Chinnici JE, Rivas A, Niparko JK, Francis HW. Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):74–82.
Marlowe, Andrea L., et al. “Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience.Otol Neurotol, vol. 31, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 74–82. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c29fad.
Marlowe AL, Chinnici JE, Rivas A, Niparko JK, Francis HW. Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):74–82.

Published In

Otol Neurotol

DOI

EISSN

1537-4505

Publication Date

January 2010

Volume

31

Issue

1

Start / End Page

74 / 82

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Speech Perception
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reoperation
  • Regression Analysis
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medical Records
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Infant