Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Alle, N; Tan, N; Huss, J; Huang, J; Pantuck, A; Raman, SS
Published in: Abdom Radiol (NY)
July 2018

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, safety and clinical utility of CT and US-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study of a cohort of 183 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous, CT or US-guided renal mass biopsy (RMB) from March 2002 through December 2012 was performed. RMB was performed in 183 consecutive patients for suspected solid renal mass of whom 14/183 (7.7%) were excluded because biopsies were performed at an outside institution, medical records were incomplete, or lesions were poorly visualized. Ten patients had multiple biopsies for new growing masses. Using US, CT or CT/US fusion-guidance, a 17G or 19G cannula needle was placed at the margin of the mass and an 18G or 20G core biopsy gun was used to obtain several tissue cores. Renal parenchymal biopsies for medical renal diseases were excluded. Imaging variables (including size, location, and extent of disease), number of core biopsies, patient demographics (age, gender), clinical indication, final pathologic diagnosis, immunohistochemical (IHC) studies, and subsequent final pathological diagnosis on nephrectomy were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 169 patients with 184 RMB, 121/169 (71.6%) were male with a mean age of 67.5 years. Of 184 RMB, 126 were malignant [126/184 (68.5%)], 37 [37/184 (20.1%)], were benign, and 21 (21/184 (11.4%) were nondiagnostic. IHC was performed in 131 biopsies (71.1%) and was diagnostic in 88.5% of those cases. Twenty-eight patients underwent subsequent partial nephrectomy; in 27/27 (100%) cases, RMB was concordant with nephrectomy for malignancy and in 21/27 (77.8%) RMB was concordant for subtype of RCC. Overall, the RMB sensitivity for detection of malignancy, specificity, and positive predictive value were 100%. The negative predictive value of benign RMB diagnosis was also 100%. There was a total of 14 (7.6%) complications, 13 minor (7.1%) and 1 major (0.5%). Of the minor complications, ten (5.5%) were postprocedural minor hematomas that resolved conservatively; one (0.5%) postprocedural vasovagal reaction; one (0.5%) episode of hematuria; and one (0.5%) episode of nausea and abdominal discomfort. No cases of renal pseudoaneurysm or tumor seeding attributed to biopsy were identified. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous image-guided RMB is safe and highly diagnostic when combined with IHC and supports a greater role of RMB and imaging in evaluating renal masses when rendering appropriate treatments.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Abdom Radiol (NY)

DOI

EISSN

2366-0058

Publication Date

July 2018

Volume

43

Issue

7

Start / End Page

1813 / 1819

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radiography, Interventional
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kidney Neoplasms
  • Kidney
  • Image-Guided Biopsy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Alle, N., Tan, N., Huss, J., Huang, J., Pantuck, A., & Raman, S. S. (2018). Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance. Abdom Radiol (NY), 43(7), 1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1337-7
Alle, Nisha, Nelly Tan, Julie Huss, Jiatoi Huang, Allan Pantuck, and Steven S. Raman. “Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.Abdom Radiol (NY) 43, no. 7 (July 2018): 1813–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1337-7.
Alle N, Tan N, Huss J, Huang J, Pantuck A, Raman SS. Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jul;43(7):1813–9.
Alle, Nisha, et al. “Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.Abdom Radiol (NY), vol. 43, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 1813–19. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00261-017-1337-7.
Alle N, Tan N, Huss J, Huang J, Pantuck A, Raman SS. Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jul;43(7):1813–1819.
Journal cover image

Published In

Abdom Radiol (NY)

DOI

EISSN

2366-0058

Publication Date

July 2018

Volume

43

Issue

7

Start / End Page

1813 / 1819

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radiography, Interventional
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kidney Neoplasms
  • Kidney
  • Image-Guided Biopsy