Skip to main content

Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dubose, TB; Cunefare, D; Cole, E; Milanfar, P; Izatt, JA; Farsiu, S
Published in: IEEE transactions on medical imaging
September 2018

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has revolutionized diagnosis and prognosis of ophthalmic diseases by visualization and measurement of retinal layers. To speed up the quantitative analysis of disease biomarkers, an increasing number of automatic segmentation algorithms have been proposed to estimate the boundary locations of retinal layers. While the performance of these algorithms has significantly improved in recent years, a critical question to ask is how far we are from a theoretical limit to OCT segmentation performance. In this paper, we present the Cramèr-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for the problem of OCT layer segmentation. In deriving the CRLBs, we address the important problem of defining statistical models that best represent the intensity distribution in each layer of the retina. Additionally, we calculate the bounds under an optimal affine bias, reflecting the use of prior knowledge in many segmentation algorithms. Experiments using in vivo images of human retina from a commercial spectral domain OCT system are presented, showing potential for improvement of automated segmentation accuracy. Our general mathematical model can be easily adapted for virtually any OCT system. Furthermore, the statistical models of signal and noise developed in this paper can be utilized for the future improvements of OCT image denoising, reconstruction, and many other applications.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

IEEE transactions on medical imaging

DOI

EISSN

1558-254X

ISSN

0278-0062

Publication Date

September 2018

Volume

37

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1978 / 1988

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Retina
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Models, Statistical
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Algorithms
  • 46 Information and computing sciences
  • 40 Engineering
  • 09 Engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dubose, T. B., Cunefare, D., Cole, E., Milanfar, P., Izatt, J. A., & Farsiu, S. (2018). Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 37(9), 1978–1988. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2017.2772963
Dubose, Theodore B., David Cunefare, Elijah Cole, Peyman Milanfar, Joseph A. Izatt, and Sina Farsiu. “Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 37, no. 9 (September 2018): 1978–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2017.2772963.
Dubose TB, Cunefare D, Cole E, Milanfar P, Izatt JA, Farsiu S. Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2018 Sep;37(9):1978–88.
Dubose, Theodore B., et al. “Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 37, no. 9, Sept. 2018, pp. 1978–88. Epmc, doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2772963.
Dubose TB, Cunefare D, Cole E, Milanfar P, Izatt JA, Farsiu S. Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2018 Sep;37(9):1978–1988.

Published In

IEEE transactions on medical imaging

DOI

EISSN

1558-254X

ISSN

0278-0062

Publication Date

September 2018

Volume

37

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1978 / 1988

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Retina
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Models, Statistical
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Algorithms
  • 46 Information and computing sciences
  • 40 Engineering
  • 09 Engineering