Skip to main content

CRISPR-Cas "Non-Target" Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Moreb, EA; Hutmacher, M; Lynch, MD
Published in: The CRISPR journal
December 2020

CRISPR-Cas systems have become ubiquitous for genome editing in eukaryotic as well as bacterial systems. Cas9 forms a complex with a guide RNA (gRNA) and searches DNA for a matching sequence (target site) next to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). Once found, Cas9 cuts the DNA. Cas9 is revolutionary for the ability to change the RNA sequence and target a new site easily. However, while algorithms have been developed to predict gRNA-specific Cas9 activity, a fundamental biological understanding of gRNA-specific activity is lacking. The number of PAM sites in the genome is effectively a large pool of inhibitory substrates, competing with the target site for the Cas9/gRNA complex. We demonstrate that increasing the number of non-target sites for a given gRNA reduces on-target activity in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, we show that the use of Cas9 mutants with increased PAM specificity toward a smaller subset of PAMs (or smaller pool of competitive substrates) improves cutting rates, while increased PAM promiscuity decreases cutting rates. Decreasing the potential search space by increasing PAM specificity provides a path toward improving on-target activity for slower high-fidelity Cas9 variants. Engineering improved PAM specificity to reduce the competitive search space offers an alternative strategy to engineer Cas9 variants with increased specificity and maintained on-target activity.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

The CRISPR journal

DOI

EISSN

2573-1602

ISSN

2573-1599

Publication Date

December 2020

Volume

3

Issue

6

Start / End Page

550 / 561

Related Subject Headings

  • RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • Nucleotide Motifs
  • Genomics
  • Genome
  • Gene Editing
  • DNA
  • Computational Biology
  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • CRISPR-Associated Proteins
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Moreb, E. A., Hutmacher, M., & Lynch, M. D. (2020). CRISPR-Cas "Non-Target" Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates. The CRISPR Journal, 3(6), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2020.0065
Moreb, Eirik A., Mitchell Hutmacher, and Michael D. Lynch. “CRISPR-Cas "Non-Target" Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates.The CRISPR Journal 3, no. 6 (December 2020): 550–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2020.0065.
Moreb EA, Hutmacher M, Lynch MD. CRISPR-Cas "Non-Target" Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates. The CRISPR journal. 2020 Dec;3(6):550–61.
Moreb, Eirik A., et al. “CRISPR-Cas "Non-Target" Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates.The CRISPR Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, Dec. 2020, pp. 550–61. Epmc, doi:10.1089/crispr.2020.0065.
Moreb EA, Hutmacher M, Lynch MD. CRISPR-Cas "Non-Target" Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates. The CRISPR journal. 2020 Dec;3(6):550–561.

Published In

The CRISPR journal

DOI

EISSN

2573-1602

ISSN

2573-1599

Publication Date

December 2020

Volume

3

Issue

6

Start / End Page

550 / 561

Related Subject Headings

  • RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • Nucleotide Motifs
  • Genomics
  • Genome
  • Gene Editing
  • DNA
  • Computational Biology
  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • CRISPR-Associated Proteins