Skip to main content

Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Natarajan, J; Mathur, S; Vishnubhatla, S; Kumar, S; Vashist, S; Ramanujam, N; Singhal, S; Meena, J; Tanwar, P; Bhatla, N
Published in: Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
December 2022

Screen positive women need to be triaged by colposcopy which is a major challenge in low-middle income countries. Portable colposcopes may overcome many challenges, reduce referrals and enable a single visit approach. This study assessed the performance of portable colposcopes and potential to reduce referral.This crossover randomised study enrolled women aged 25 to 65 years with abnormal screening result or cervical symptoms. All women underwent visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), HPV test, colposcopy with two portable colposcopes (Gynocular®, Gynius, Sweden, and Pocket® transvaginal colposcope, Duke University, NC, USA) and a standard video colposcope, and biopsy. Colposcopic Swede score agreement between portable and video colposcopes, as well as agreement of Swede score with histology were calculated for each device. The potential impact of portable colposcopes in a single visit approach was assessed based on the final diagnosis.Among 250 subjects, 27(10.80%) had high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) lesions. Swede scores for Pocket and Gynocular colposcopes were similar to video colposcope in 248 (99.20%) and 247 (98.80%) subjects, respectively (agreement scores 0.9969 and 0.9954, respectively). At a Swede score cut-off of ≥5, all three devices had identical sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 96.30%, 92.30%, 60.50% and 99.50,. Ablative treatment offered at field setting would result in optimal treatment in 52.0% and 85.1% cases when screened with VIA and HPV test respectively; using Pocket colposcope could improve this to 94.0% and 95.9%, respectively. Overtreatment and referral rates reduced from 46.8% and 12.4% to 4.8% and 6.0%, respectively, when VIA test is followed by triage with pocket colposcope. These outcomes were comparable to screening with HPV followed by colposcopy triage.Pocket colposcope performed comparably to the video colposcope. Used by healthcare providers in the field setting, they can augment the results of VIA significantly.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP

DOI

EISSN

2476-762X

ISSN

1513-7368

Publication Date

December 2022

Volume

23

Issue

12

Start / End Page

4013 / 4021

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Pregnancy
  • Papillomavirus Infections
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Cross-Over Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Natarajan, J., Mathur, S., Vishnubhatla, S., Kumar, S., Vashist, S., Ramanujam, N., … Bhatla, N. (2022). Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, 23(12), 4013–4021. https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.12.4013
Natarajan, Jayashree, Sandeep Mathur, Sreenivas Vishnubhatla, Sunesh Kumar, Shachi Vashist, Nimmi Ramanujam, Seema Singhal, Jyoti Meena, Pranay Tanwar, and Neerja Bhatla. “Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP 23, no. 12 (December 2022): 4013–21. https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.12.4013.
Natarajan J, Mathur S, Vishnubhatla S, Kumar S, Vashist S, Ramanujam N, et al. Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2022 Dec;23(12):4013–21.
Natarajan, Jayashree, et al. “Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, vol. 23, no. 12, Dec. 2022, pp. 4013–21. Epmc, doi:10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.12.4013.
Natarajan J, Mathur S, Vishnubhatla S, Kumar S, Vashist S, Ramanujam N, Singhal S, Meena J, Tanwar P, Bhatla N. Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2022 Dec;23(12):4013–4021.

Published In

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP

DOI

EISSN

2476-762X

ISSN

1513-7368

Publication Date

December 2022

Volume

23

Issue

12

Start / End Page

4013 / 4021

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Pregnancy
  • Papillomavirus Infections
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Cross-Over Studies