Skip to main content

Reproducibility of lung density quantification across photon-counting and conventional energy-integrating CT: a comparative study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sotoudeh-Paima, S; Samei, E; Abadi, E
Published in: Br J Radiol
November 1, 2025

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how photon-counting CT (PCCT) reproducibly quantifies lung density compared to conventional CT (energy-integrating CT or EICT) and assess the relevance of image quality. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective study, subjects underwent acquisitions using EICT and PCCT systems (August-December 2021) on the same day. PCCT projections were reconstructed with 4 kernels and 2 voxel sizes using 2024 reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). PCCT and EICT data were compared using lung density measurements: percentage of low-attenuation areas <-950 Hounsfield unit (HU) (LAA-950), 15th percentile of lung density histogram (Perc15), and mean lung density (MLD). Measurement reproducibility and its relation to image quality parameters (modulation transfer function and noise) were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects (mean age, 67.4 years ± 9.6, 30 female) were studied. PCCT images had the closest agreement to EICT under identical voxel size and similar kernels, yielding lower LAA-950 (-0.9% ± 2.7, P < 0.05), higher Perc15 (1.4 HU ± 7.9, P > 0.05), and higher MLD (2.4 HU ± 10.8, P > 0.05). At higher PCCT resolution (1024 × 1024 matrix, 0.2 mm slice thickness), the smoother quantitative kernel (Qr36) improved agreement, with differences of -0.5% ± 3.0, -0.1 HU ± 9.8, and 2.8 HU ± 11.1, for LAA-950, Perc15, and MLD (P > 0.05). Image quality parameters strongly correlated with density measurements (RPerc152=85.3%). CONCLUSIONS: PCCT yields reproducible lung density measurements comparable to EICT, with optimal reproducibility dependent on optimized reconstruction parameters and explainable by image quality parameters. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Lung density reproducibility is critical for integrating PCCT into EICT-based workflows. In our study, PCCT aligned more closely with EICT using similar kernels at identical voxel sizes, or smoother kernels at smaller voxel sizes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Br J Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1748-880X

Publication Date

November 1, 2025

Volume

98

Issue

1175

Start / End Page

1890 / 1898

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Prospective Studies
  • Photons
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lung
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sotoudeh-Paima, S., Samei, E., & Abadi, E. (2025). Reproducibility of lung density quantification across photon-counting and conventional energy-integrating CT: a comparative study. Br J Radiol, 98(1175), 1890–1898. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf103
Sotoudeh-Paima, Saman, Ehsan Samei, and Ehsan Abadi. “Reproducibility of lung density quantification across photon-counting and conventional energy-integrating CT: a comparative study.Br J Radiol 98, no. 1175 (November 1, 2025): 1890–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf103.
Sotoudeh-Paima, Saman, et al. “Reproducibility of lung density quantification across photon-counting and conventional energy-integrating CT: a comparative study.Br J Radiol, vol. 98, no. 1175, Nov. 2025, pp. 1890–98. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/bjr/tqaf103.

Published In

Br J Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1748-880X

Publication Date

November 1, 2025

Volume

98

Issue

1175

Start / End Page

1890 / 1898

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Prospective Studies
  • Photons
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lung