Skip to main content

Reproducibility of Lung Density Quantification across Photon-counting and Conventional Energy-integrating CT: A Comparative Study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sotoudeh-Paima, S; Samei, E; Abadi, AE
Published in: Br J Radiol
May 10, 2025

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how photon-counting CT (PCCT) reproducibly quantifies lung density compared to conventional CT (energy-integrating CT or EICT) and assess the relevance of image quality. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective study, subjects underwent acquisitions using EICT and PCCT systems (August-December 2021) on the same day. PCCT projections were reconstructed with four kernels and two voxel sizes using 2024 reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). PCCT and EICT data were compared using lung density measurements: percentage of low-attenuation areas <-950 HU (LAA-950), 15th percentile of lung density histogram (Perc15), and mean lung density (MLD). Measurement reproducibility and its relation to image quality parameters (modulation transfer function and noise) were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects (mean age, 67.4 years ± 9.6, 30 female) were studied. PCCT images had the closest agreement to EICT under identical voxel size and similar kernels, yielding lower LAA-950 (-0.9%±2.7, p < 0.05), higher Perc15 (1.4HU ± 7.9, p > 0.05), and higher MLD (2.4 HU ± 10.8, p > 0.05). At higher PCCT resolution (1024 × 1024 matrix, 0.2 mm slice thickness), the smoother quantitative kernel (Qr36) improved agreement, with differences of -0.5%±3.0, -0.1HU ± 9.8, and 2.8HU ± 11.1, for LAA-950, Perc15, and MLD (p > 0.05). Image quality parameters strongly correlated with density measurements (RPerc152=85.3%). CONCLUSIONS: PCCT yields reproducible lung density measurements comparable to EICT, with optimal reproducibility dependent on optimized reconstruction parameters and explainable by image quality parameters. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Lung density reproducibility is critical for integrating PCCT into EICT-based workflows. In our study, PCCT aligned more closely with EICT using similar kernels at identical voxel sizes, or smoother kernels at smaller voxel sizes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Br J Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1748-880X

Publication Date

May 10, 2025

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sotoudeh-Paima, S., Samei, E., & Abadi, A. E. (2025). Reproducibility of Lung Density Quantification across Photon-counting and Conventional Energy-integrating CT: A Comparative Study. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf103
Sotoudeh-Paima, Saman, Ehsan Samei, and And Ehsan Abadi. “Reproducibility of Lung Density Quantification across Photon-counting and Conventional Energy-integrating CT: A Comparative Study.Br J Radiol, May 10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf103.
Sotoudeh-Paima, Saman, et al. “Reproducibility of Lung Density Quantification across Photon-counting and Conventional Energy-integrating CT: A Comparative Study.Br J Radiol, May 2025. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/bjr/tqaf103.

Published In

Br J Radiol

DOI

EISSN

1748-880X

Publication Date

May 10, 2025

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences