Skip to main content

Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Barber, SJ; Rajaram, S; Marsh, EJ
Published in: Memory (Hove, England)
November 2008

Previous classroom studies have shown that the phenomenology of studied facts changes over time. However, pedagogical needs preclude both the study of errors and the separation of the effects that delay and repeated testing have on retention and retrieval experience. We addressed these issues together in an experiment where participants read stories containing correct and misleading information and provided Remember, Just Know, and Familiar judgements on immediate and delayed general knowledge tests. After 2 days, information learned from the stories shifted from Remembered to Just Known, but repeated testing attenuated this shift. Interestingly, similar patterns of retrieval and phenomenology were observed for correct and misleading information with one important difference--the shift over time to Just Knowing was significantly greater for correct than for misleading information. Together, these findings show the roles of information accuracy, delay, and testing in determining both retention and the subjective experience of retrieval.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Memory (Hove, England)

DOI

EISSN

1464-0686

ISSN

0965-8211

Publication Date

November 2008

Volume

16

Issue

8

Start / End Page

934 / 946

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Time Factors
  • Students
  • Retention, Psychology
  • Recognition, Psychology
  • Psychological Tests
  • Practice, Psychological
  • Mental Recall
  • Learning
  • Judgment
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Marsh, E. J. (2008). Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Memory (Hove, England), 16(8), 934–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802360603
Barber, Sarah J., Suparna Rajaram, and Elizabeth J. Marsh. “Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.Memory (Hove, England) 16, no. 8 (November 2008): 934–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802360603.
Barber SJ, Rajaram S, Marsh EJ. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Memory (Hove, England). 2008 Nov;16(8):934–46.
Barber, Sarah J., et al. “Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.Memory (Hove, England), vol. 16, no. 8, Nov. 2008, pp. 934–46. Epmc, doi:10.1080/09658210802360603.
Barber SJ, Rajaram S, Marsh EJ. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Memory (Hove, England). 2008 Nov;16(8):934–946.

Published In

Memory (Hove, England)

DOI

EISSN

1464-0686

ISSN

0965-8211

Publication Date

November 2008

Volume

16

Issue

8

Start / End Page

934 / 946

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Time Factors
  • Students
  • Retention, Psychology
  • Recognition, Psychology
  • Psychological Tests
  • Practice, Psychological
  • Mental Recall
  • Learning
  • Judgment