Skip to main content

A comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) - Relevance to morphology of microcalcifications for isocentric motion in Digital Breast tomosynthesis (DBT)

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chen, Y; Lo, JY; Dobbins, JT
Published in: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE
December 1, 2007

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a three-dimensional imaging technique providing an arbitrary set of reconstruction planes in the breast with limited series of projection images. This paper describes a comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) algorithms by impulse response and modulation transfer function (MTF) analysis. Due to the partial isocentric motion of the x-ray tube in DBT, structures such as microcalcifications appear slightly blurred in traditional shift-and-add (SAA) images in the direction perpendicular to the direction of tube 's motion. Point-by-point BP improved rendition of microcalcifications. The sharpness and morphology of calcifications were improved in a human subject images. A Filtered Back Projection (FBP) deblurring approach was used to demonstrate deblurred point-by-point BP tomosynthesis images. The point-by-point BP rather than traditional SAA should be considered as the foundation of further deblurring algorithms for DBT reconstruction. ©2007 IEEE.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE

DOI

Publication Date

December 1, 2007

Start / End Page

563 / 569
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chen, Y., Lo, J. Y., & Dobbins, J. T. (2007). A comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) - Relevance to morphology of microcalcifications for isocentric motion in Digital Breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE, 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2007.4375617
Chen, Y., J. Y. Lo, and J. T. Dobbins. “A comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) - Relevance to morphology of microcalcifications for isocentric motion in Digital Breast tomosynthesis (DBT).” Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE, December 1, 2007, 563–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2007.4375617.
Chen Y, Lo JY, Dobbins JT. A comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) - Relevance to morphology of microcalcifications for isocentric motion in Digital Breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE. 2007 Dec 1;563–9.
Chen, Y., et al. “A comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) - Relevance to morphology of microcalcifications for isocentric motion in Digital Breast tomosynthesis (DBT).” Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE, Dec. 2007, pp. 563–69. Scopus, doi:10.1109/BIBE.2007.4375617.
Chen Y, Lo JY, Dobbins JT. A comparison between traditional shift-and-add (SAA) and point-by-point back projection (BP) - Relevance to morphology of microcalcifications for isocentric motion in Digital Breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE. 2007 Dec 1;563–569.

Published In

Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE

DOI

Publication Date

December 1, 2007

Start / End Page

563 / 569