Skip to main content

Comparison of qualitative and quantitative acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods

Publication ,  Conference
Nightingale, KR; Rouze, NC; Wang, MH; Zhai, L; Palmeri, ML
Published in: Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
November 2, 2011

Acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods utilize focused acoustic beams to mechanically excite tissue and ultrasonic correlation based methods to monitor the dynamic response of the tissue, which reflects the underlying tissue stiffness. Both qualitative images and quantitative images can be derived depending upon the selected beam sequences and data processing algorithms. Qualitative images provide good spatial resolution and contrast, but reflect only relative differences in tissue stiffness. Quantitative measurements of tissue stiffness can be obtained by measuring the speed of propagating shear waves induced in tissue by acoustic radiation force. In homogeneous media, time-of-flight (TOF) measurements of shear wave speed (SWS) ideally are independent of the size of the region of interest (or reconstruction kernel), thus extensive averaging can be performed to improve estimate accuracy and precision. However, in heterogeneous media, shear wave morphology is altered by discontinuities in stiffness due to reflections or boundary conditions which introduce error to the measured SWS. In addition, the size of the reconstruction kernel limits the spatial resolution, or ability to precisely localize changes in stiffness. This study investigates the impact of: arrival time estimation method, shear wavelength, and reconstruction kernel size on the accuracy and spatial resolution of TOF SWS reconstruction in heterogeneous media using finite element method (FEM) simulations. © 2011 IEEE.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

DOI

EISSN

1945-8452

ISSN

1945-7928

Publication Date

November 2, 2011

Start / End Page

1606 / 1609
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nightingale, K. R., Rouze, N. C., Wang, M. H., Zhai, L., & Palmeri, M. L. (2011). Comparison of qualitative and quantitative acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods. In Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (pp. 1606–1609). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872710
Nightingale, K. R., N. C. Rouze, M. H. Wang, L. Zhai, and M. L. Palmeri. “Comparison of qualitative and quantitative acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods.” In Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 1606–9, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872710.
Nightingale KR, Rouze NC, Wang MH, Zhai L, Palmeri ML. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods. In: Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. 2011. p. 1606–9.
Nightingale, K. R., et al. “Comparison of qualitative and quantitative acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods.” Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2011, pp. 1606–09. Scopus, doi:10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872710.
Nightingale KR, Rouze NC, Wang MH, Zhai L, Palmeri ML. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative acoustic radiation force based elasticity imaging methods. Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. 2011. p. 1606–1609.

Published In

Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

DOI

EISSN

1945-8452

ISSN

1945-7928

Publication Date

November 2, 2011

Start / End Page

1606 / 1609