Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kerin, JF; Cooper, JM; Price, T; Herendael, BJV; Cayuela-Font, E; Cher, D; Carignan, CS
Published in: Hum Reprod
June 2003

BACKGROUND: Unlike laparoscopic surgery for interval tubal sterilization, a hysteroscopic approach obviates surgical incision and requires only local anaesthesia or intravenous sedation. The safety, tolerability and efficacy of an hysteroscopically placed micro-insert device was evaluated. METHODS: A cohort of 227 previously fertile women participated in this prospective international multicentre trial. Micro-inserts were placed bilaterally into the proximal Fallopian tube lumens under hysteroscopic visualization in outpatient procedures. RESULTS: Successful bilateral micro-insert placement was achieved in 88% of women. The majority of women reported that intraprocedural pain was less than or equal to that expected, and 90% rated tolerance of the device placement procedure as good to excellent. Most women could be discharged in an ambulatory state within 1-2 h. Adverse events occurred in 7% of the women, but none was serious. Correct device placement was confirmed in 97% of cases at 3 months. Over 24 months follow-up, 98% of study participants rated their tolerance of the micro-insert as very good to excellent. After 6015 woman-months of exposure to intercourse, no pregnancies have been recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopic sterilization resulted in rapid patient recovery without unacceptable post-procedure pain, as well as high long-term patient tolerability, satisfaction and effective permanent contraception.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Hum Reprod

DOI

ISSN

0268-1161

Publication Date

June 2003

Volume

18

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1223 / 1230

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sterilization, Tubal
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pain
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kerin, J. F., Cooper, J. M., Price, T., Herendael, B. J. V., Cayuela-Font, E., Cher, D., & Carignan, C. S. (2003). Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study. Hum Reprod, 18(6), 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg256
Kerin, John F., Jay M. Cooper, Thomas Price, Bruno J Van Herendael, Enrique Cayuela-Font, Daniel Cher, and Charles S. Carignan. “Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study.Hum Reprod 18, no. 6 (June 2003): 1223–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg256.
Kerin JF, Cooper JM, Price T, Herendael BJV, Cayuela-Font E, Cher D, et al. Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jun;18(6):1223–30.
Kerin, John F., et al. “Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study.Hum Reprod, vol. 18, no. 6, June 2003, pp. 1223–30. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/humrep/deg256.
Kerin JF, Cooper JM, Price T, Herendael BJV, Cayuela-Font E, Cher D, Carignan CS. Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jun;18(6):1223–1230.
Journal cover image

Published In

Hum Reprod

DOI

ISSN

0268-1161

Publication Date

June 2003

Volume

18

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1223 / 1230

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sterilization, Tubal
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pain
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Humans
  • Female