Scholars@Duke publication: Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5]

Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5]

Publication , Journal Article

Warren, WS; He, Q; McCoy, M; Spano, FC

Published in: The Journal of Chemical Physics

January 1, 1992

The Journal of Chemical Physics

0021-9606

January 1, 1992

1659 / 1661

APA

Chicago

ICMJE

MLA

NLM

Warren, W. S., He, Q., McCoy, M., & Spano, F. C. (1992). Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 96(2), 1659–1661. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.462156

Warren, W. S., Q. He, M. McCoy, and F. C. Spano. “Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5].” The Journal of Chemical Physics 96, no. 2 (January 1, 1992): 1659–61. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.462156.

Warren WS, He Q, McCoy M, Spano FC. Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5]. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1992 Jan 1;96(2):1659–61.

Warren, W. S., et al. “Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5].” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 96, no. 2, Jan. 1992, pp. 1659–61. Scopus, doi:10.1063/1.462156.

Warren WS, He Q, McCoy M, Spano FC. Reply to the comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real? [5]. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1992 Jan 1;96(2):1659–1661.

The Journal of Chemical Physics

0021-9606

January 1, 1992

1659 / 1661