Skip to main content

Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Alt, E; Evans, F; Wolf, PD; Pasquantonio, J; Stotts, L; Heinz, S; Schömig, A
Published in: Heart (British Cardiac Society)
March 1997

To determine whether considerably smaller capacitors could replace 125 microF capacitors as the standard for use in implantable defibrillators.Measured energy, impedance, voltage, and current delivered were compared at defibrillation threshold in 10 mongrel dogs for defibrillation using 75 microF and 125 microF capacitors alternated randomly. Defibrillation was attempted with biphasic shocks of comparable tilt between an endocardial lead in the right ventricular apex and a "dummy" active can of an experimental implantable device placed in the subpectoral position.A reduction of capacitor size of 40% was associated with an increase in voltage of 21% and in current of 22%. With a 65% tilt, no significant differences were found between the two capacitances with respect to the impedance or energy required for defibrillation.Multiple advances in electrode material, electrode configuration, shock morphology, and shock polarity have reduced defibrillation energy requirements. Smaller capacitors could be used in implantable cardioverter/defibrillators without a major decrease in effectiveness.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Heart (British Cardiac Society)

DOI

EISSN

1468-201X

ISSN

1355-6037

Publication Date

March 1997

Volume

77

Issue

3

Start / End Page

234 / 237

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Fibrillation
  • Miniaturization
  • Heart
  • Equipment Design
  • Electric Conductivity
  • Dogs
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Animals
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Alt, E., Evans, F., Wolf, P. D., Pasquantonio, J., Stotts, L., Heinz, S., & Schömig, A. (1997). Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators? Heart (British Cardiac Society), 77(3), 234–237. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.77.3.234
Alt, E., F. Evans, P. D. Wolf, J. Pasquantonio, L. Stotts, S. Heinz, and A. Schömig. “Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?Heart (British Cardiac Society) 77, no. 3 (March 1997): 234–37. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.77.3.234.
Alt E, Evans F, Wolf PD, Pasquantonio J, Stotts L, Heinz S, et al. Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators? Heart (British Cardiac Society). 1997 Mar;77(3):234–7.
Alt, E., et al. “Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?Heart (British Cardiac Society), vol. 77, no. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 234–37. Epmc, doi:10.1136/hrt.77.3.234.
Alt E, Evans F, Wolf PD, Pasquantonio J, Stotts L, Heinz S, Schömig A. Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators? Heart (British Cardiac Society). 1997 Mar;77(3):234–237.

Published In

Heart (British Cardiac Society)

DOI

EISSN

1468-201X

ISSN

1355-6037

Publication Date

March 1997

Volume

77

Issue

3

Start / End Page

234 / 237

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Fibrillation
  • Miniaturization
  • Heart
  • Equipment Design
  • Electric Conductivity
  • Dogs
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Animals
  • 3202 Clinical sciences