Skip to main content

Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lee, WH; Lisanby, SH; Laine, AF; Peterchev, AV
Published in: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
2013

We have proposed that the current amplitude in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) be lowered to produce stimulation closer to the neural activation threshold and individualized to account for anatomical variability across patients. A novel approach to individualize the ECT current amplitude could be via motor threshold (MT) determination with transcranial electric stimulation (TES) applied through the ECT electrodes instead of the fixed high current approach. This study derives an estimate of the electric field (E-field) neural activation threshold and tests whether individual differences in TES MT are explained by anatomical variability measurements and simulations in individual head models. The E-field distribution induced by a right unilateral (RUL) ECT electrode configuration was computed in subject-specific finite element head models of four nonhuman primates (NHPs) for whom MT was measured. By combining the measured MTs and the computed E-field maps, the neural activation threshold is estimated to be 0.45 ± 0.07 V/cm for 0.2 ms stimulus pulse width. The individual MT was correlated with the electrode-to-cortex distance under the superior electrode (R(2)=.96, p=.022) as well as with the simulated electrode-current/induced-E-field ratio (R(2)=.95, p=.026), indicating that both anatomical measurements and computational models could predict the individual current requirements for transcranial stimulation. These findings could be used with realistic human head models and in clinical studies to explore novel ECT dosing paradigms, and as a new noninvasive means to determine individual dosage requirement with ECT.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc

DOI

EISSN

2694-0604

Publication Date

2013

Volume

2013

Start / End Page

815 / 818

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensory Thresholds
  • Motor Cortex
  • Models, Neurological
  • Male
  • Macaca mulatta
  • Humans
  • Electrodes
  • Electric Conductivity
  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Brain Mapping
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lee, W. H., Lisanby, S. H., Laine, A. F., & Peterchev, A. V. (2013). Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2013, 815–818. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609625
Lee, Won Hee, Sarah H. Lisanby, Andrew F. Laine, and Angel V. Peterchev. “Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013 (2013): 815–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609625.
Lee WH, Lisanby SH, Laine AF, Peterchev AV. Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:815–8.
Lee, Won Hee, et al. “Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 815–18. Pubmed, doi:10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609625.
Lee WH, Lisanby SH, Laine AF, Peterchev AV. Anatomical variability predicts individual differences in transcranial electric stimulation motor threshold. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:815–818.

Published In

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc

DOI

EISSN

2694-0604

Publication Date

2013

Volume

2013

Start / End Page

815 / 818

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensory Thresholds
  • Motor Cortex
  • Models, Neurological
  • Male
  • Macaca mulatta
  • Humans
  • Electrodes
  • Electric Conductivity
  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Brain Mapping