UPDATE: PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION: The authors examine recent literature on sacrocolpopexy: Can the abdominal approach still be considered the standard? And do the alternative approaches measure up?
Publication
, Other
Kawasaki, A; Amundsen, CL
Published in: OBG Management
2010
Duke Scholars
Published In
OBG Management
Publication Date
2010
Volume
22
Issue
10
Start / End Page
20 / 29
Article type
Magazine
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kawasaki, A., & Amundsen, C. L. (2010). UPDATE: PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION: The authors examine recent literature on sacrocolpopexy: Can the abdominal approach still be considered the standard? And do the alternative approaches measure up? OBG Management.
Kawasaki, A., and C. L. Amundsen. “UPDATE: PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION: The authors examine recent literature on sacrocolpopexy: Can the abdominal approach still be considered the standard? And do the alternative approaches measure up?” OBG Management, 2010.
Kawasaki A, Amundsen CL. UPDATE: PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION: The authors examine recent literature on sacrocolpopexy: Can the abdominal approach still be considered the standard? And do the alternative approaches measure up? Vol. 22, OBG Management. 2010. p. 20–9.
Kawasaki, A., and C. L. Amundsen. “UPDATE: PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION: The authors examine recent literature on sacrocolpopexy: Can the abdominal approach still be considered the standard? And do the alternative approaches measure up?” OBG Management, vol. 22, no. 10, 2010, pp. 20–29.
Kawasaki A, Amundsen CL. UPDATE: PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION: The authors examine recent literature on sacrocolpopexy: Can the abdominal approach still be considered the standard? And do the alternative approaches measure up? OBG Management. 2010. p. 20–29.
Published In
OBG Management
Publication Date
2010
Volume
22
Issue
10
Start / End Page
20 / 29
Article type
Magazine