Meaning What We Say: The ‘Politics of Theory’ and the Responsibility of Intellectuals
Journal articles
- Chapter
Moi, T
January 1, 2024
‘The desire for a theory that guarantees political radicalism and, idea1ly, political effectiveness, has been strong in recent years’, Jonathan Culler writes. As a feminist literary critic and theorist I know what he means, for I belong precise]y to the group of intellectuals for whom the question of the ‘politics of theory’ has been a cause of concern for a long time. Radical theorists often ask themselves whether the writing they do, which tends to be specialized and fairly abstract, really makes a political difference. Whenever I think about this I feel comforted by the thought that someintellectual works, at least, have had tremendous impact.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Moi, T. (2024). Meaning What We Say: The ‘Politics of Theory’ and the Responsibility of Intellectuals, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199265350.003.0007
Moi, T. “Meaning What We Say: The ‘Politics of Theory’ and the Responsibility of Intellectuals,” January 1, 2024, 139–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199265350.003.0007.
Moi T. Meaning What We Say: The ‘Politics of Theory’ and the Responsibility of Intellectuals. 2024 Jan 1;139–60.
Moi, T. Meaning What We Say: The ‘Politics of Theory’ and the Responsibility of Intellectuals. Jan. 2024, pp. 139–60. Scopus, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199265350.003.0007.
Moi T. Meaning What We Say: The ‘Politics of Theory’ and the Responsibility of Intellectuals. 2024 Jan 1;139–160.