Skip to main content

The hysteretic evapotranspiration - Vapor pressure deficit relation

Publication ,  Journal Article
Zhang, Q; Manzoni, S; Katul, G; Porporato, A; Yang, D
Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
January 1, 2014

Diurnal hysteresis between evapotranspiration (ET) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) was reported in many ecosystems, but justification for its onset and magnitude remains incomplete with biotic and abiotic factors invoked as possible explanations. To place these explanations within a holistic framework, the occurrence of hysteresis was theoretically assessed along a hierarchy of model systems where both abiotic and biotic components are sequentially added. Lysimeter evaporation (E) measurements and model calculations using the Penman equation were used to investigate the effect of the time lag between net radiation and VPD on the hysteresis in the absence of any biotic effects. Modulations from biotic effects on the ET-VPD hysteresis were then added using soil-plant-atmosphere models of different complexities applied to a grassland ecosystem. The results suggest that the hysteresis magnitude depends on the radiation-VPD lag, while the plant and soil water potentials are both key factors modulating the hysteretic ET-VPD relation as soil moisture declines. In particular, larger hysteresis magnitude is achieved at less negative leaf water potential, root water potential, and soil water potential. While plant hydraulic capacitance affects the leaf water potential-ET relation, it has negligible effects on the ET-VPD hysteresis. Therefore, the genesis and magnitude of the ET-VPD hysteresis are controlled directly by both abiotic factors such as soil water availability, biotic factors (leaf and root water potentials, which in turn depend on soil moisture), and the time lag between radiation and VPD. Key Points Plant water potential, soil water, PAR-VPD lag controls the ET-VPD hysteresis Leaf (or root) potential controls the hysteresis magnitude in a linear manner Soil moisture controls the ET-VPD hysteresis magnitude in a complex way ©2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

DOI

EISSN

2169-8961

Publication Date

January 1, 2014

Volume

119

Issue

2

Start / End Page

125 / 140

Related Subject Headings

  • 3706 Geophysics
  • 0404 Geophysics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Zhang, Q., Manzoni, S., Katul, G., Porporato, A., & Yang, D. (2014). The hysteretic evapotranspiration - Vapor pressure deficit relation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 119(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002484
Zhang, Q., S. Manzoni, G. Katul, A. Porporato, and D. Yang. “The hysteretic evapotranspiration - Vapor pressure deficit relation.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 119, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002484.
Zhang Q, Manzoni S, Katul G, Porporato A, Yang D. The hysteretic evapotranspiration - Vapor pressure deficit relation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2014 Jan 1;119(2):125–40.
Zhang, Q., et al. “The hysteretic evapotranspiration - Vapor pressure deficit relation.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, vol. 119, no. 2, Jan. 2014, pp. 125–40. Scopus, doi:10.1002/2013JG002484.
Zhang Q, Manzoni S, Katul G, Porporato A, Yang D. The hysteretic evapotranspiration - Vapor pressure deficit relation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2014 Jan 1;119(2):125–140.

Published In

Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

DOI

EISSN

2169-8961

Publication Date

January 1, 2014

Volume

119

Issue

2

Start / End Page

125 / 140

Related Subject Headings

  • 3706 Geophysics
  • 0404 Geophysics