Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men
Publication
, Journal Article
Coleman, J; Beale, S; Chemerinsky, E
Published in: Chicago Kent Law Review
2007
Duke Scholars
Published In
Chicago Kent Law Review
Publication Date
2007
Volume
82
Start / End Page
691 / 710
Related Subject Headings
- 1801 Law
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Coleman, J., Beale, S., & Chemerinsky, E. (2007). Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men. Chicago Kent Law Review, 82, 691–710.
Coleman, J., S. Beale, and E. Chemerinsky. “Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men.” Chicago Kent Law Review 82 (2007): 691–710.
Coleman J, Beale S, Chemerinsky E. Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men. Chicago Kent Law Review. 2007;82:691–710.
Coleman, J., et al. “Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men.” Chicago Kent Law Review, vol. 82, 2007, pp. 691–710.
Coleman J, Beale S, Chemerinsky E. Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence From 12 Angry Men. Chicago Kent Law Review. 2007;82:691–710.
Published In
Chicago Kent Law Review
Publication Date
2007
Volume
82
Start / End Page
691 / 710
Related Subject Headings
- 1801 Law