After Recess: Historical Practice, Textual Ambiguity, and Constitutional Adverse Possession
Publication
, Journal Article
Siegel, N; Bradley, C
Published in: Supreme Court Review
2014
Duke Scholars
Published In
Supreme Court Review
Publication Date
2014
Start / End Page
1 / 70
Related Subject Headings
- Law
- 1801 Law
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Siegel, N., & Bradley, C. (2014). After Recess: Historical Practice, Textual Ambiguity, and Constitutional Adverse Possession. Supreme Court Review, 1–70.
Siegel, N., and C. Bradley. “After Recess: Historical Practice, Textual Ambiguity, and Constitutional Adverse Possession.” Supreme Court Review, 2014, 1–70.
Siegel N, Bradley C. After Recess: Historical Practice, Textual Ambiguity, and Constitutional Adverse Possession. Supreme Court Review. 2014;1–70.
Siegel, N., and C. Bradley. “After Recess: Historical Practice, Textual Ambiguity, and Constitutional Adverse Possession.” Supreme Court Review, 2014, pp. 1–70.
Siegel N, Bradley C. After Recess: Historical Practice, Textual Ambiguity, and Constitutional Adverse Possession. Supreme Court Review. 2014;1–70.
Published In
Supreme Court Review
Publication Date
2014
Start / End Page
1 / 70
Related Subject Headings
- Law
- 1801 Law